TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Yahoo Homepage – Now Featuring Extra-Scammy Scams

317 点作者 rosenjon超过 10 年前

18 条评论

mpeg超过 10 年前
Just want to point out that AdChoices is NOT owned by Google, and they do NOT serve any advertising.<p>It&#x27;s a program organised by the DAA (Digital Advertising Alliance) which is itself formed of several other advertising associations, the goal of which is to be a self-regulatory program allowing to opt out of online behavioral advertising, so that you do not have to see any behavior targeted ads if you choose not to.<p>Google&#x27;s display network is a part of the AdChoices program, but not every ad showing that icon is a Google ad. In fact, from the yahoo.com homepage, only the banner ads seem to be served by Google, sponsored articles are being served by Yahoo! directly. If you click the AdChoices button it will actually tell you who is placing the ad.<p>I&#x27;m not the biggest paladin of Google, but in this case everything points to the ad being served by Yahoo!<p>EDIT: From what I could find, it&#x27;s likely the ads are being served by the Yahoo! streamads[0] self-serve platform.<p>Programmatic is always tricky to properly validate, because it&#x27;s expensive to fact check every single creative that comes through. It&#x27;s likely that, if reported, Yahoo will ban the advertiser from their platform.<p>Facebook uses a whitelist approach where they&#x27;ll manually validate your first few creatives and then whitelist you for automatic validation, not sure if Yahoo employs the same method.<p>[0] <a href="https://streamads.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;streamads.yahoo.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #8984799 未加载
评论 #8985576 未加载
dredmorbius超过 10 年前
99% of online advertisers give the rest a bad name.<p>Not only is this why online advertising is ultimately doomed, but it&#x27;s why we hugely and desperately and badly need to find another way of paying for content.<p>The alternatives for the moment are gratis, patronage, &quot;native advertising&quot;, and subscriptions. Few of these strike me as ultimately scalable.<p>I&#x27;ve been a fan of Phil Hunt, of Pirate Party UK, and his broadband tax proposal after more-or-less independently coming up with the same idea myself. Hunt&#x27;s proposal was principally aimed at music. I see no reason why it cannot apply to <i>all</i> content published and distributed online.<p><a href="http://cabalamat.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/a-broadband-tax-for-the-uk/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cabalamat.wordpress.com&#x2F;2009&#x2F;01&#x2F;27&#x2F;a-broadband-tax-fo...</a><p>My own sketched proposal: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/1uotb3/a_modest_proposal_universal_online_media_payment/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;dredmorbius&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1uotb3&#x2F;a_modest...</a> <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2h0h81/specifying_a_universal_online_media_payment/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;dredmorbius&#x2F;comments&#x2F;2h0h81&#x2F;specifyi...</a>
评论 #8984057 未加载
评论 #8983923 未加载
评论 #8984082 未加载
评论 #8984316 未加载
评论 #8983865 未加载
评论 #8984536 未加载
评论 #8984639 未加载
评论 #8983948 未加载
评论 #8983924 未加载
bad_user超过 10 年前
I was originally against ad-blockers, because it provides me with an incentive to look for alternatives and I also want to reward websites that don&#x27;t do this shit.<p>However, it&#x27;s because of scams and malware pushed by means of ads that I started using ad-blockers myself and I recommend it to all my non-technical friends.<p>It&#x27;s also the reason for why on my Android I&#x27;m now using Firefox. For Google to not provide at least a glimpse of a plan for Chrome&#x27;s add-ons support on Android is unacceptable, for one because I now expect my browser to have add-ons support and I originally started using Chrome based on this expectation and because on mobile these websites are even more aggressive in pushing their ads. And with Firefox I can use AdBlock Plus on my Android, with uBlock coming soon.
评论 #8983751 未加载
评论 #8985071 未加载
评论 #8984083 未加载
评论 #8985047 未加载
评论 #8983827 未加载
r1ch超过 10 年前
Adwords is becoming increasingly bad with these kind of ads lately. Yahoo are lucky that they don&#x27;t have the automatic redirecting version that simply takes visitors away from your site onto these fake landing pages. Most of them seem to be coming from compromised adwords accounts.<p>As a publisher it&#x27;s very difficult to do anything about this since Google apparently let adwords publishers insert arbitrary javascript into their ad code. This makes it so the ad creative and &quot;destination domain&quot; in the review center mean absolutely nothing, and since the JS won&#x27;t execute from the review center you have no idea which ads are responsible.
评论 #8984188 未加载
评论 #8985038 未加载
nugget超过 10 年前
This is the dark side of the massive shift to programmatic ad buying and selling which nobody wants to talk about. Compliance has largely been tossed aside in search of maximum yield. Sad but definitely the trend for the future.
评论 #8983667 未加载
DanBC超过 10 年前
&gt; “[...]I ordered one bottle of Brain Storm Elite, entered my payment and shipping info, next thing I know, I have been charged $144 for another product “The Memory Plus”. I NEVER gave “MP” any CC information or anything, when I called BrainStorm about this, they say they are affiliated but do not have access to Memory Plus accounts, I asked how Memory Plus got my credit card information because the only website I was on was for BrainStorm. Big Surprise, someone else would have to get back to me on that. Filed report with BBB.”<p>How do these companies survive having their merchant accounts closed after all the inevitable chargebacks?
评论 #8984377 未加载
mbesto超过 10 年前
My favorites are Taboola and Outbrain who basically do this as a turnkey service. They&#x27;ve both received $99m+ in funding...<p>As as a user, I&#x27;ve never seen these as remotely valuable.<p><a href="https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/taboola" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crunchbase.com&#x2F;organization&#x2F;taboola</a><p><a href="https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/outbrain" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crunchbase.com&#x2F;organization&#x2F;outbrain</a>
评论 #8995376 未加载
jarcane超过 10 年前
This kind of thing is, frankly, yet another reason why I employ an adblocker.
评论 #8984246 未加载
brokentone超过 10 年前
I&#x27;ve worked primarily on the publisher side and observed such advertisements, but where to point the finger can be really difficult. There are so many affected parties here.<p>Should Yahoo be held at fault by the consumer? What does that even mean, a boycott? Does Yahoo have a direct relationship with these scammers, or how many connections away are they? Is this a network or programatic placement? Do discovery magazine and CNN go after this company for trademark issues? Does this former homeless man go after them for endorsement issues? Does it even have a US point of presence at all?
Fede_V超过 10 年前
This is great detective work, and hopefully Yahoo steps in and fixes this.<p>Online advertising has become and more vicious - on all my computers, I run adblock&#x2F;no script, etc, but on my phone, browsing sites like retractionwatch or theatlantic, I&#x27;ve been redirected to full page ads for subscription services where the automatic subscription button is about 1mm where the &#x27;close window&#x27; button appears.
评论 #8983847 未加载
martinko超过 10 年前
Hm, now the link in the article (www.discoverpresentsonline.com&#x2F;david-brain&#x2F;report.html) just redirects to the real discover magazine.
评论 #8983729 未加载
评论 #8983964 未加载
PaulHoule超过 10 年前
It has been way for a while, but it has gotten worse.<p>I used to check out Yahoo Finance once a day because it used to have real financial news but now if you look at the front page template about 60% of it is allocated to the same scam ads that run over and over and less than 40% to real content.<p>Needless to say I don&#x27;t use Yahoo Finance regularly anymore.
hellbanTHIS超过 10 年前
Seems like branding is the way to go on the internet, rather than throwing crap in peoples faces.<p>Example: Yahoo News, brought to you ad free by Nationwide Insurance<p>Then people think &quot;I like Yahoo News, I like Nationwide Insurance&quot; instead of &quot;I hate that scummy ad, I hate Yahoo News&quot;.
评论 #8986626 未加载
owly超过 10 年前
Anyone have experience blocking ads at the firewall level? Possibly too many URLs to block? Also, what&#x27;s Yahoo? ;) DDG FTW
dnlmzw超过 10 年前
That is quite disturbing.
blumkvist超过 10 年前
&gt;Do companies like Brainstorm Elite ever pay the price for wholesale fraud and the theft of brand identities?<p>Yes, they do. The FTC takes them for every penny they got. At least the big ones.<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/01/the-dark-lord-of-the-internet/355726/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2014&#x2F;01&#x2F;the-dark...</a>
评论 #8983636 未加载
评论 #8983775 未加载
评论 #8983851 未加载
评论 #8984051 未加载
评论 #8984847 未加载
chatman超过 10 年前
Shame on Yahoo!
argc超过 10 年前
This makes me want to puke. Nice one, Yahoo.... makes you look GREAT.