TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple's original business plan

186 点作者 sirteno超过 10 年前

14 条评论

NhanH超过 10 年前
The plan itself looks reasonable to me. It&#x27;s fairly buzzword-free (comparing to the plans nowadays), but maybe the buzzword back then just became common vocabulary to us.<p>The most interesting thing on the plan to me is the staff page: specifically how non-impressive the credentials of everyone on the team is. It&#x27;s fun to think that Jobs might have embellish a little there (attended Stanford part) just to look better. Even the one with most credentials (Markkula, I believe) just read like a normal upper-middle management bio nowadays. And Woz &amp; Jobs ... well, I don&#x27;t think any company nowadays would be able to raise fund if the founder s&#x27; bios look like that.<p>Am I wrong?
评论 #8989534 未加载
评论 #8988976 未加载
评论 #8988542 未加载
评论 #8991142 未加载
评论 #8988764 未加载
eddywebs超过 10 年前
The source of this document is computer history muesem website. linky &gt;&gt; <a href="http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/2009/102712693.05.01acc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.computerhistory.org&#x2F;resources&#x2F;text&#x2F;2009&#x2F;10271...</a>
评论 #8987992 未加载
kgc超过 10 年前
Direct download link: <a href="http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/2009/102712693.05.01acc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.computerhistory.org&#x2F;resources&#x2F;text&#x2F;2009&#x2F;10271...</a>
swamp40超过 10 年前
I wonder why &quot;Apple&quot; is whited out? The &quot;Staff&quot; page pretty much gives it away.
评论 #8987823 未加载
评论 #8987656 未加载
coreyh14444超过 10 年前
Modern conventional wisdom would tell them to &quot;focus&quot;.
评论 #8988306 未加载
评论 #8988081 未加载
评论 #8987743 未加载
maxsavin超过 10 年前
Interesting - Jobs went to Stanford?<p>Also, surprising he let him self be #3 on the list after apparently picking a fight with Woz about who would be employee #1
评论 #8988185 未加载
评论 #8988009 未加载
chrispeel超过 10 年前
From a couple of sources it looks like their revenue forecasts for the PC market were too low: <a href="http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES_pcww1203.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.etforecasts.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;ES_pcww1203.htm</a><p>I&#x27;m curious who the target of this was; was this aimed at the banks who they got the $250k loan from that Markkula signed for?
caublestone超过 10 年前
I don&#x27;t think this is Apple. On page 5 it specifically calls out Apple as being part of the Hobbyist market. That right there makes this even more interesting as this thorough business plan was beat out by a company recognized as Hobbyist instead of a pc manufacturer.<p>So who is this?
评论 #8988735 未加载
评论 #8988510 未加载
staunch超过 10 年前
&gt; <i>Because of the applications development ability of the software oriented hobbyist, Apple will continue to service his needs.</i><p>Developers. Developers. Developers. Developers. Developers.
nsxwolf超过 10 年前
Whatever that reader app they are using is... Wow does it suck on iOS Safari. I can&#x27;t figure out what the heck is going on.
mraison超过 10 年前
Interesting to see that the &quot;growth curve&quot; was already a thing back then.
评论 #8989240 未加载
fit2rule超过 10 年前
Is it usable as a template for a business plan today?
ezl超过 10 年前
I wouldn&#x27;t invest. That growth curve doesn&#x27;t seem reasonable.<p>VC&#x27;s: I don&#x27;t really see there being an interest in this. What&#x27;s the viral coefficient?
评论 #8987911 未加载
评论 #8987888 未加载
评论 #8988042 未加载
mkaroumi超过 10 年前
Omg, THANKS for sharing this!
评论 #8987822 未加载