TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Interest rates on some European government bonds have gone negative

70 点作者 cwal37超过 10 年前

12 条评论

mrb超过 10 年前
<i>&quot;And yet it seems the impossible has happened.&quot;</i><p>This is a great example showing how little we understand economics, which is very ironic: economics is the study of something that is 100% man-made, yet we cannot explain many of its aspects. Heck I am more confident in physicists able to explain physics, and mathematicians able to explain mathematics, than in economists able to explain economics. This is why topics such as basic income guarantee [1], Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, inflation vs deflation, capitalism vs socialism, etc, are all so debated. Nobody agrees on anything because quite frankly, we don&#x27;t know how to make the economy work optimally. I would not be surprised if, 50 or 100 years from now, widely accepted views on economics will completely change.<p>[1] There was a great HN post from yesterday: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9004287" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9004287</a>
评论 #9006335 未加载
评论 #9006088 未加载
评论 #9006385 未加载
评论 #9006542 未加载
评论 #9006300 未加载
评论 #9006006 未加载
kazinator超过 10 年前
This should be no news to consumers who have been accustomed to parking their money in negative bonds. These are called &quot;checking and savings accounts&quot;, where interest is next to nonexistent, and the balance is nibbled away by various fees.<p>People still put their money in the bank for similar reasons why people buy these negative interest bonds: for example, it&#x27;s secure, and cheaper than building your own safe, putting cash in it, and guarding it.<p>If you want to hold some foreign currency, you could just buy it and have it sitting in a trading account. But there are perhaps some fees involved which are worse than parking it in a negative bond. The account may also not be secured compared to a bond.
fiatmoney超过 10 年前
One thing they don&#x27;t mention as a cause is regulatory requirements to hold certain classes of sovereign debt or other &quot;risk-free&quot; securities, for instance as collateral.
评论 #9005590 未加载
评论 #9005840 未加载
randomname2超过 10 年前
A lot of this is also frontrunning the central banks. The ECB has already indicated they will buy german bonds (which have negative yield). Rates can (and will) go even negative-er, so if you buy now and sell later, you still make a profit.
cwal37超过 10 年前
Thanks for changing the title, I always just err on the side of leaving it, even if it is absolutely terrible (as this one originally was).<p>On the actual topic, it&#x27;s always interesting to see things go differently than economists expected. I fill an economist-ish role at work and it&#x27;s kind of amazing to see the union of hand wavey-ness and certainty that pervades so much of the field. We drill down hard on data and stick with open source tools like Python as much as possible, but I definitely look around and see supposition treated as fact.
评论 #9005294 未加载
nostromo超过 10 年前
I can&#x27;t shake the feeling we&#x27;re going to see another black swan in &#x27;15 or &#x27;16. Maybe the epicenter will be Greece this time instead of Bear Stearns.<p><a href="http://i.imgur.com/UyM0j2M.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;UyM0j2M.jpg</a><p>I&#x27;m curious to see what the Fed will do if we have a correction while interest rates are at zero. I suppose 0% + QE will become standard policy rather than a response to a crisis.
评论 #9006449 未加载
tosseraccount超过 10 年前
US Treasury yields went negative in 2008 ...<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/business/10markets.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2008&#x2F;12&#x2F;10&#x2F;business&#x2F;10markets.html</a><p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2008/12/09/three-month-bill-yield-goes-negative/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blogs.wsj.com&#x2F;marketbeat&#x2F;2008&#x2F;12&#x2F;09&#x2F;three-month-bill-...</a>
评论 #9006484 未加载
api超过 10 年前
Economists also thought stagflation was impossible before the USA in the late 70s.
评论 #9004872 未加载
_sword超过 10 年前
Europe&#x27;s economy is in a very bad place
评论 #9005276 未加载
评论 #9006761 未加载
jhundal超过 10 年前
I&#x27;m not sure this article gets the definition of the zero lower bound right (though I&#x27;d love to be corrected if it does.) As I understood it, the ZLB only applies to central bank lending rates to other banks, which if they become negative the other banks only have the incentive to hoard cash.
DunbarTrout超过 10 年前
Could someone buy one of these negative bonds in hopes to short sell it? I barely understand shorting, but it seems like this would be an opportunity (I realize shorting is always risky).
评论 #9005492 未加载
RaCaS123超过 10 年前
Certain corporate baonds have as well. Notably, Nestle&#x27;s are negative.
评论 #9006098 未加载