TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hacking Passion (2013)

60 点作者 masters3d大约 10 年前

6 条评论

saulrh大约 10 年前
Talent is a thing. However, it&#x27;s a bit different from what people think it is: inherent talents are about <i>acquiring skills</i>, not <i>having skills</i>. Talent won&#x27;t make you magically good at something. What it will do is make it easier for you to practice a skill and let you improve faster. And even then, it only does that if you help it along, and sometimes it&#x27;s not very obvious how it helps. I have a bit of talent for science and mathematics, but it&#x27;s not incredibly direct; rather, I tend to start spewing ideas when looking at sciencey things. That doesn&#x27;t make me magically good at producing good science, but it did help me stay interested early on and it keeps me from plateauing. Talent also isn&#x27;t <i>necessary</i>. You can get really, really good at something without having any inherent advantage, and lots of people do exactly that.
TrainedMonkey大约 10 年前
Talent may be BS, but difference in memory, learning, and concentration are not. So while everyone can improve some people have easier time and higher ceiling.
评论 #9066286 未加载
评论 #9066214 未加载
BadassFractal大约 10 年前
Extremely advantageous genetics are really hard to measure with current technology outside of fields such as sports. e.g. in strength sports, by the late teens it&#x27;s really obvious who has it and who doesn&#x27;t: some can effortlessly pull 3x a weight that&#x27;s practically unobtainable for someone else of same weight category. Talent is real in sports, there&#x27;s no reason why it wouldn&#x27;t be in every other area of life. Talent is optional if you&#x27;re going to be OK at something, but it&#x27;s a basic prerequisite if you&#x27;re going to be competing at world class.<p>Things are a lot trickier with brains, since there&#x27;s actually a lot more internal structural variability. Current scanning technology isn&#x27;t accurate enough to tell us what the teenager (brain structures stop growing by this point) is going to be naturally good at, but that&#x27;s not that far away given enough investment and the technology and enough data (basically other brains to compare to)
Swizec大约 10 年前
&quot;Hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard&quot;<p>But more importantly, talent isn&#x27;t &quot;what you&#x27;re good at&quot;, talent is &quot;what you enjoy&quot;.
craigyk大约 10 年前
I don&#x27;t think talent is BS, but there is certainly a lot of BS in evaluating it.
demircancelebi大约 10 年前
I really enjoyed reading this, thanks masters3d.