hacker news front page ->
http://i.imgur.com/qjcd6z7.png
new section ->
http://i.imgur.com/KKj24Kl.png<p>I am using Chrom OS<p>here are some more screen shots->
http://i.imgur.com/3Lv2RXd.png
my link that did not make it to the front page
http://i.imgur.com/o0nbGN3.png
Good riddance! Your link "List of authoritarian regimes.." is exactly the kind of links I don't want to see on HN. Your competitor "Interactive go..." is exactly the kind of links I DO want to see.
HN is strongly moderated, censored, has a biased ranking system and a very biased community.<p>It's not a matter of fair. It is what it is, and it works the way the owners and most users like it. And it is done very, very well.<p>Personally, I think the bias has become so strong that the lack of a viable alternative or reddit-style autonomous subs is really starting to grate.<p>HN has become a homogenous echo chamber in which saying the "wrong" thing will get you buried or even slow/shadow banned.<p>But usually the manipulation is more subtle in avoiding those discussions altogether, and this may be a typical example of that. (Which in itself would an excellent example of good, subtle moderation.)<p>The great irony is that on a platform that considers politics to be off-topic, political and ideological bias dominates almost everything but the most neutral of scientific and technological topics.<p>But I suspect most HN-ers, including the moderators, are barely aware of that bias because they operate inside a bubble of like-minded people within a very narrow ideological spectrum.<p>But "fair" doesn't come into it. It works as intended.