TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Introducing Google Cloud Storage Nearline

366 点作者 paukiatwee大约 10 年前

22 条评论

omh大约 10 年前
The detailed pricing is at <a href="https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing#nearline-pricing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;storage&#x2F;pricing#nearline-pricing</a><p>In short, if I&#x27;m understanding correctly:<p><pre><code> $0.01 per GB per month storage $0.01 per GB retrieval Normal egress fees on top, so additional ~$0.10 per GB if you want to retrieve outside of Google Cloud. Early deletion fee. Effectively just a minimum storage charge of 1 month. </code></pre> It seems this is cheaper than Glacier and quite a bit simpler. The speed restrictions are interesting though.
评论 #9184363 未加载
weitzj大约 10 年前
Quote: &quot;This is a Beta release of Nearline Storage. This feature is not covered by any SLA or deprecation policy and may be subject to backward-incompatible changes.&quot;<p>So should I believe in Google&#x27;s good-will? I would be fine trying out some services, which are in Google Beta. But my valuable data? They should have a SLA right from the start to gain the user&#x27;s trust.
评论 #9184824 未加载
评论 #9184942 未加载
评论 #9184969 未加载
评论 #9184888 未加载
评论 #9184918 未加载
评论 #9185122 未加载
评论 #9187257 未加载
评论 #9188691 未加载
评论 #9185166 未加载
评论 #9184807 未加载
评论 #9185348 未加载
gaul大约 10 年前
I added GCS nearline to my object storage comparison:<p><a href="http://gaul.org/object-store-comparison/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gaul.org&#x2F;object-store-comparison&#x2F;</a>
评论 #9184486 未加载
评论 #9184556 未加载
评论 #9184358 未加载
crb大约 10 年前
1c&#x2F;GB&#x2F;mo for data stored, ~3 seconds response times (cf. tape&#x2F;Glacier at multiple hours), 11 9s durability, same API as Google Cloud Storage online.<p>(edit: add &#x2F;month)
评论 #9184539 未加载
评论 #9184305 未加载
sp332大约 10 年前
Isn&#x27;t the price a little high? $10&#x2F;TB&#x2F;mo is the same as Dropbox, and this has a lot fewer features than Dropbox.
评论 #9184284 未加载
评论 #9184239 未加载
评论 #9184282 未加载
评论 #9185529 未加载
评论 #9190509 未加载
moe大约 10 年前
This is a nail in the coffin of the SaaS backup industry (Backblaze, RescuePlan, etc.).<p>With storage becoming essentially free the last excuse for <i>not</i> using self-hosted, secure backup tools like Arq[1] disappears.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.haystacksoftware.com/arq/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.haystacksoftware.com&#x2F;arq&#x2F;</a>
评论 #9184704 未加载
评论 #9184599 未加载
评论 #9184461 未加载
评论 #9184406 未加载
评论 #9184453 未加载
评论 #9184468 未加载
评论 #9184966 未加载
评论 #9184720 未加载
SEJeff大约 10 年前
So is this a blatant dig at Amazon&#x27;s Glacier? &quot;Fast performance... unlike competitors&quot;<p>As they generally do tit for tat on price wars, it will be interesting to see what Amazon responds with.
评论 #9184190 未加载
pjc50大约 10 年前
So how is this implemented? Spun-down disk drives?
评论 #9184195 未加载
评论 #9188417 未加载
评论 #9188418 未加载
bkruse大约 10 年前
I own a big wholesale telco that does tons of data center business and bandwidth. Of course, margins are super thin so we need great pricing. We are no Google, but we can achieve the same pricing, including the cost of bandwidth (that is 9-9s of durability and no spin-up time, which is where the 3-seconds come from)<p>Maybe I should start my own service to harness all this infrastructure with something like swift!
nda大约 10 年前
from the documentation: &quot;You should expect 4 MB&#x2F;s of throughput per TB of data stored as Nearline Storage. This throughput scales linearly with increased storage consumption.&quot;
评论 #9184205 未加载
评论 #9184069 未加载
评论 #9184230 未加载
nda大约 10 年前
The same egress and data transfer charges as for Google Cloud Storage Standard &#x2F; DRA. Can transfer the data from Standard to Nearline bucket for free until Jun, 11 - <a href="https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing#network-regions" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;storage&#x2F;pricing#network-regions</a>
评论 #9185059 未加载
tiernano大约 10 年前
slightly off topic here, but when i tried to setup an account, which should get me $300 free, it auto selects my country (Ireland) and then tells me:<p>Tax status Business<p>This service can only be used for business or commercial reasons. You are responsible for assessing and reporting VAT.<p>and then makes me enter a VAT number... well, I will stick with AWS and Azure, since neither of those &quot;REQUIRE&quot; a vat number or business status.<p>PS: i know a business name costs about EUR20 to setup, but the VAT requirement is the pain in the left one...
评论 #9204885 未加载
AndyJack1979大约 10 年前
Our story with Amazon Glacier (50TB):, we are a company with 50TB of data on multiple Servers and NAS, and some External drives, most of the data we needed to save&#x2F;Archive for 10 years at least, it’s starting to become very hard to manage locally, so we saw glacier a great solution for us! Well, not exactly<p>We tried to manually using it, like APIs, Scripts, etc… it’s impossible, it was very had<p>So we tried cloudberry to help us upload, it will upload but also It won’t work for huge data, with glacier you won’t be able to search, list, find any file you want to download easily, also its not practical to manage all the backup and millions of files manually, also we got millions of photos we needed a way to find them easily like thumbs So Glacier had so many restrictions like 3-5 hours restore time, 5% restore quota hard to use even with utilizes like cloudberry, cant list, search, it’s not useable as its! But the price was attractive<p>We considered Seagate Evault , but it was expensive and so many hidden fees and complicated for our case Then we tired another solution called Zoolz ( <a href="http://www.zoolz.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zoolz.com</a> ), Zoolz does not use your own AWS Account, but utilize their own account and from what I heard from them they got 5 Petabyte, so they got massive restore quota, around 5% of the 5 Petabyte, also its simple to use, they offer Zero restore cost, it’s like Mozy or Crashplan but for business and on glacier , like they internally create thumbs for your photos and store it on S3, so you have instant preview, also you will be able to search and browse your data easily and instantly, they got Servers and Polices, and got a reasonable price, all we wanted , we got the 50TB for $12,000 &#x2F; year, its more expensive than using Glacier by itself, using Glacier will cost around $6000, but its not practical for a company to use it as a standalone storage<p>The only disadvantage is that when&#x2F;if we needed a file we have to wait 4 hours to get it, which is fair, it was faster than when we used to use Tapes :), awe tried to restore 1 TB with 1.2 million files, it took us around 10 hours to complete, which was okay
g8oz大约 10 年前
Can you do rsync style differential backups with this?
评论 #9187172 未加载
bernadus_edwin大约 10 年前
Is azure has the product like this? Usually cloud war start from amazon, then google, and then azure is the last one
Jolielov大约 10 年前
I still rather use a Cloud Service provider like Zoolz as it would be more efficient to benefit from other plans. Amazing idea though!
cornellwright大约 10 年前
Great to finally see a cloud service competing against Glacier. Hopefully this will lead to some sort of response from AWS.
joelthelion大约 10 年前
I wonder what the underlying hardware is?
knocte大约 10 年前
Does anyone know of any online-storage offering that allows paying in bitcoin and allows API access? Thanks
评论 #9184434 未加载
评论 #9186166 未加载
zobzu大约 10 年前
&quot;nearline, still online, but we could make a graph that is supposed to make you believe its not&quot;
wyldfire大约 10 年前
The transport for this service is HTTP? I imagine most competitors use that as well, right? How does encoding factor in here? I have to transcode my data to base64 in order to put it in or take it out, I assume? I &quot;know&quot; I&#x27;d only get billed for the data stored as the original octet&#x2F;binary encoding. But what about the egress fees? Encoded or decoded data is the input for the billing?
评论 #9187241 未加载
评论 #9187098 未加载
fivedogit大约 10 年前
Some of these Google&#x2F;Amazon&#x2F;Apple &quot;Introducing Product X...&quot; stories are starting to strike me as intellectually devoid, creeping into &quot;free advertising&quot; territory.<p>This particular story is about a Google service that is an extremely late entrant into the market (Amazon Glacier, etc) and offers almost nothing new. I&#x27;m not saying it&#x27;s a bad product or not useful to folks, but it&#x27;s not, by any means, groundbreaking. I&#x27;d much rather see the top spot of HN occupied by some startup&#x27;s new idea or a researcher&#x27;s new findings.<p>I also don&#x27;t mean to imply that &quot;big corporate&quot; == bad. Certain products -- self driving cars, Space X automated landings, etc -- are absolutely worthy of our attention and discussion. I just hope that people would think twice before upvoting a story merely because it&#x27;s from Google.
评论 #9185775 未加载