A counter argument: Uber breaks rules, a large number of people have no issue with it and consider it fighting an unfair regulatory system. These guys break the rules on Twitter and everyone sides with Twitter.<p>Now, I'm on the side of Twitter in this one, but I think it's an interesting thought experiment. To me the difference is that they ended up bothering Twitter's users (as seen by the comments on this thread), whereas Uber just bothered cab drivers, cab company owners and medallion holders - a relatively small audience that has pissed off a lot people.<p>There's also the issue of whether Twitter has a monopoly in the same sense that the cab companies do.