AT&T not happy with Verizon ads: 'There's a lawsuit for that'

It's interesting that AT&#38;T isn't disputing the lack of 3G coverage claim. Instead, they're stretching to say Verizon was implying something else with clearly-labeled maps.<p>Pretty inane. I doubt they'll win. It reflects pretty badly on them, too.

If Verizon's PR people are good they'll milk this all the way to the bank. Let this drag on, generate a lot of press coverage, keep harping on the fact that AT&#38;T really <i>doesn't</i> have good 3G coverage.

AT&#38;T should counter with a pie chart of "percent of population with 3G coverage". AT&#38;T's and Verizon's coverage will look identical then.<p>(I used to have AT&#38;T, and traveled a lot, but was never out of range of their 3G service. Verizon certainly has a good network, but AT&#38;T's is not horribly bad.)

Both maps clearly state 3G coverage in the ad and do not say network coverage anywhere in it, why even go for a lawsuit like this?