TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

App Submissions On Google Play Now Reviewed By Staff, Include Age-Based Ratings

149 点作者 kshatrea大约 10 年前

18 条评论

lnanek2大约 10 年前
I&#x27;ve already been getting kind of ridiculous suspensions due to this. A dice puzzle game where all you ever earned was points for making the right patterns was banned for encouraging gambling.<p>So, uh, goodbye one of the few things that made developing for Google better than developing for Apple. Really don&#x27;t know how they could possibly be bragging about this.
评论 #9222089 未加载
moubarak大约 10 年前
after getting 100k active users, and over 2million sessions per week, which was 1 year after submitting my app, google play suspended my app without warning, and i lost all.<p>they were right, i didn&#x27;t accurately follow their terms, but if they reviewed my app once submitted a year ago, that could&#x27;ve been avoided.<p>it was a bitter experience for me, and i decided to port my app to iOS. i heard iOS provides warnings atleast.
评论 #9219332 未加载
评论 #9219747 未加载
评论 #9219191 未加载
评论 #9219228 未加载
评论 #9219568 未加载
ChrisClark大约 10 年前
And they&#x27;ve been doing it for the past few months and no one knew. So I think this is a good thing all around, as long as review times don&#x27;t increase to Apple levels.
__xtrimsky大约 10 年前
Nice. I just hope they won&#x27;t be as annoying as Apple.
评论 #9218445 未加载
philip1209大约 10 年前
Google tries to automate everything, so it amuses me that they have had to fall back to manual reviewers instead of fully automating the process.
评论 #9219279 未加载
pasta_2大约 10 年前
Ironic given how the rhetoric suggested the &quot;walled garden&quot; was an evil to be avoided. Over time Apple is being proven right.
评论 #9221050 未加载
moron4hire大约 10 年前
Wasn&#x27;t the point of creating walled-garden app stores the notion that it created checks and balances to prevent malware and bad user experiences from getting on people&#x27;s devices? Wasn&#x27;t that the entire reason we were supposed to be fine with the notion that we&#x27;d be giving up a portion of revenue to be able to get onto users devices in pretty much the only way the vast majority of our users understood how to do?<p>In other words, &quot;you had ONE job, app stores, ONE JOB.&quot;
评论 #9220370 未加载
ajjai大约 10 年前
That&#x27;s nice.. I hope, now, they will respond to developer queries also..
blingojames大约 10 年前
Two companies and possibly very few people decide what apps will reach a billion people. Sure wish we could elect those people.
评论 #9222382 未加载
评论 #9222383 未加载
pluma大约 10 年前
This seems like a surprising deviation from their traditional stance of &quot;throwing more people at a problem is never an acceptable answer&quot; (which is almost literally their justification for off-loading the bulk of their support to an online manual and a &quot;users helping users&quot; forum with &quot;actual humans&quot; being a scarce resource even paying customers are usually allowed to tap into).
avinassh大约 10 年前
Now, will there be any increase in developer program fee? Since reviewing requires resources and will cost more money to Google now onwards.
speeder大约 10 年前
I noticed they are working with ClassInd but are not clear how.<p>I really hope this won&#x27;t open the door to censorship on Android, one of the reasons why I make mobile games is exactly to circunvent ClassInd (as the article calls it).<p>Here in Brazil, to release any entertainment product (even live Circus Shows are included on this), you must first ask the Ministry of Justice to give you a rating, the process, specially for things that aren&#x27;t a Circus Show, is very long, slow and cumbersome (example: you need to do it again every time you make an official update of your software, and the process involves writing lots of paperwork, sending the physical papers to the Ministry, and waiting AT LEAST 30 days).<p>Although officially they claim it is NOT censorship, the process is mandatory for all entertainment, even if free, the law allow them to punish (with 2 years in prison and fines) anyone that are distributing, storing, selling, buying or creating things without ratings, and they can deny rating you (meaning that even if you ask, if they deny the rating, you are de-facto censored).<p>This does have an obvious effect here:<p>People here create fake US accounts to buy stuff on Xbox Live and PSN, because the local versions of XBL and PSN follow the law, and has much less content.<p>Steam don&#x27;t have official Brazillian offices, although recently they stated to charge in BRL, and have portuguese translations, the charging part is handled by Brazillian companies and credit card processors, in a way that if Brazil government go ater Steam, Steam can just cut-off Brazil (and let the CC processors take the blame and the lawsuit).<p>Apple for a while, got in conflict with the government here, the Ministry of Justice threatened to sue Apple for 2000 BRL for each unrated app, back then 300.000 unrated apps already existed, Apple in response just set entire categories to be hidden from iTunes users with Brazillian IPs or accounts (leading to lots of fake accounts, sometimes using stolen CCs, and iTunes access using proxies).<p>Eventually, some merciful judge ruled that since Apple don&#x27;t have offices here, they don&#x27;t have to follow our law, opening access again.<p>Also, like I said, I make mobile apps to avoid that law, what I do is that I have a Brazil company, a Swiss company, and then I make the Swiss company, hire the Brazil company to create software for hire, then the Swiss company that &quot;create&quot; the completed entertainment software, and sells it (including to Brazillian users, that frequently pay with international CC, of course this leads to lots of inefficiency, since I have to pay taxes on exchanging CHF to BRL, after users already paid taxes on exchanging BRL to CHF, beside the exchange fees, the sale tax from Brazil to Switzerland, and the income taxes on both Brazil and Switzerland).
评论 #9219785 未加载
tomjen3大约 10 年前
If they want to make the appstore a better place, why not spend some time to make search work? I dunno, an eigen-vector algorithm of some sort.<p>Copying Apples mistakes are not the way to go.
评论 #9219237 未加载
solomatov大约 10 年前
These are very good news. We have enough malware and spyware in play store.
killdill大约 10 年前
I always wonder how big a staff they would need to review so many apps uploaded every day.
Galactigon大约 10 年前
I like the Apps, Games, Utilities method of organization.<p>I didn&#x27;t see any word on judging &#x27;content&#x27;.
emsy大约 10 年前
As an Android and iOS user, I think this is a step in the right direction. As a player I&#x27;d rather have a curated games store that allows me to discover new games easily.
评论 #9219717 未加载
sergiotapia大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m glad Google got the funding necessary to hire more -people- to review submissions. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)