TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Fighting fires with sound frequencies

99 点作者 oulipian大约 10 年前

6 条评论

waffle_ss大约 10 年前
This isn&#x27;t an entirely new concept - explosives have been used for over 100 years to put out oil well fires[1] for example, due to the difficulty of cutting off the fuel source.<p>[1]: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_well_fire#Extinguishing_the_fires" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Oil_well_fire#Extinguishing_the...</a>
评论 #9258065 未加载
Someone1234大约 10 年前
I&#x27;ve been thinking about this exact concept since the Mythbusters tested it. I&#x27;m glad someone has gone out and prove it has legs&#x2F;pushed it forward.<p>While I could see the benefit for the scenarios they listed (aircraft, space shuttles, etc) I actually think the real killer use could be for forest fires.<p>With forest fires you&#x27;re constantly running out of water, and the only way to ship it the location it is needed is often multi-hour drives (which consume a lot of fuel).<p>If this concept worked then instead of moving water from A to B you only now have to worry about an energy source (e.g. diesel). So you could drive up a truck with generator on it and diesel in a fireproof tank, and then spend hours extinguishing fires.<p>Now, yes, fires can reignite. However that is also true with water, water evaporates extremely quickly from an area that was on fire both because that area is extremely dry, because of the ambient heat, and also because it likely started out hot to begin with.<p>PS - Fire retardants help keeping fires out, but they&#x27;re bad for the environment and are also hard to keep supplied in remote areas, and when you&#x27;re refilling directly from a river.
评论 #9258764 未加载
评论 #9258716 未加载
IshKebab大约 10 年前
It sounds like they&#x27;re basically blowing the fire out, which is why it only works on really easy-to-blow-out flames.<p>Good luck blowing out a forest fire!
评论 #9259062 未加载
评论 #9259606 未加载
评论 #9261578 未加载
NIL8大约 10 年前
“One of the problems with sound waves is that they do not cool the fuel,” Isman said. “So even if you get the fire out, it will rekindle if you don’t either take away the fuel or cool it.”<p>Not to dumb it down, but I can see this being an effective tool for preventing grease flare-ups in my grill. It won&#x27;t cool the coals, but it will kill the flames.
buckyball大约 10 年前
So, just add some sort of cooling beam, better: cooling rays technology, cross beams et voilà! Oh, wait ...
alimoeeny大约 10 年前
How does it work?<p>I mean is it a new discovery that some frequencies create resonance and stop the convection and prevent oxygenation of the flame?<p>Or is it just using sheer power to &quot;blow&quot; the flame off? but instead of a blower, it just uses very high powered speaker in low frequency?
评论 #9257609 未加载
评论 #9257524 未加载
评论 #9257481 未加载