TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Slack Chats

107 点作者 bleakgadfly大约 10 年前

16 条评论

davidw大约 10 年前
Right now, the top post is about how FoundationDB got acquired and promptly taken out of circulation.<p>This is currently 2nd, and is written with the idea of helping people form communities on top of a proprietary system.<p>Slack seems like it might be a good thing for companies, but for public stuff, I&#x27;ll continue to stick with IRC.<p>I&#x27;ll add: this site seems like a cool idea and good work by whoever created it, but I&#x27;m just averse to building on that particular foundation.
评论 #9261854 未加载
评论 #9261839 未加载
评论 #9263963 未加载
评论 #9261868 未加载
benjamincburns大约 10 年前
It may look like it, but this isn&#x27;t the Slack (team chat sold at slack.com) you&#x27;re thinking of.<p>Top post on there right now:<p><pre><code> A quick note from Jeff Morris Jr. (founder of Slack Chats): Slack Chats was created to help you meet interesting new people. We are not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc. Thanks for your awesome support! :) </code></pre> I smell a rebranding coming. If it wasn&#x27;t for that post I would&#x27;ve assumed this was something from Slack Technologies. Even the logo is so similar...<p>Worse yet, this is building negative brand recognition for Slack Technologies at the moment, as the UI polish isn&#x27;t what we&#x27;d expect from the Slack team, and their page isn&#x27;t keeping up w&#x2F; HN traffic.
评论 #9262356 未加载
评论 #9261998 未加载
评论 #9263947 未加载
saurik大约 10 年前
Multiple people here seem to be confused by this project, drawing conclusions about Slack itself from its functionality and performance, or in one case trying to reason about its privacy policy based on the one from Slack.com. Despite leaning heavily on Slack&#x27;s name, this is not an official project: it is some random designer who threw together a website that exposes people to Slack&#x27;s product for a purpose (public chats) which Slack currently does not support: both implicitly in the way they set up their features and pricing, and explicitly when asked, such as for the article that came out about them in The Next Web today.<p>&gt; I asked the company how it felt about these communities popping up even though it’s not exactly sanctioned and a press relations person told me that “it’s great that people are putting Slack to good use” but unfortunately “these communities are not something we have the capacity to support given the growth in our existing business.”<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2015/03/24/slack-is-quietly-unintentionally-killing-irc/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;thenextweb.com&#x2F;insider&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;24&#x2F;slack-is-quietly-un...</a><p>I would say &quot;using other people&#x27;s names in confusing ways that border on impersonation should maybe be illegal&quot;, but of course it is: Slack is definitely popular enough in this space to deserve implicit trademark status. (And, before someone invokes the standard whine of &quot;you can&#x27;t own a word like Slack&quot;, trademarks are <i>not</i> about &quot;owning words&quot;: they are about protecting people—the people who see the word, not the people who use the word—from being deceived, either on purpose or on accident, by someone using a name within the same highly-restricted context in a way that is confusing.)<p>(edit: I am glad to see benjamincburns also noted this in his comment elsewhere on this post. I noticed his comment after I had written my comment, and I figured I provide some useful detail on this not even being a sanctioned use, so I decided to leave my additional comment. He is also soon a great service now of replying to some of the people to clear up confusion.)
评论 #9262077 未加载
评论 #9262081 未加载
petercooper大约 10 年前
So the thing I&#x27;ve wondered about.. if you create an interesting community on Slack, what&#x27;s to stop them pulling the rug from under your feet and eventually start charging everyone? Their free offering is <i>really</i> good and I hope the paid users will subsidize it forever, but then I&#x27;ve seen what has happened with other services over the years..
评论 #9262224 未加载
wamatt大约 10 年前
Maybe this is a silly question, but how do you login?<p>If one needs to be invited, is that a standard process the visitor can initiate?
评论 #9261955 未加载
评论 #9262060 未加载
07a大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m concerned that websites which abuse Slack like this are going to ruin Slack&#x27;s free tier for those of us who rely on it for more legitimate purposes. I cannot possibly comprehend the mindset behind someone who would choose to use Slack for these purposes when IRC has existed since the 80s and accomplishes the same task much better. Nor do I understand why we are leaching onto Slack when Hipchat has existed with a similar free tier for a while now.<p>And it <i>is</i> abuse. From the company itself: &quot;these communities are not something we have the capacity to support given the growth in our existing business.&quot; [1]<p>[1] <a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2015/03/24/slack-is-quietly-unintentionally-killing-irc/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;thenextweb.com&#x2F;insider&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;24&#x2F;slack-is-quietly-un...</a>
评论 #9263803 未加载
评论 #9263835 未加载
评论 #9264411 未加载
BinaryIdiot大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m finding this app very, very slow and kinda quirky. I also noticed it&#x27;ll let you send comments to the server and even response positively without being logged into the system but I don&#x27;t see the comments actually being displayed so I&#x27;m guessing they&#x27;re silently being ignored?
joekinley大约 10 年前
So it&#x27;s basically another internet forum?
评论 #9261844 未加载
评论 #9261870 未加载
评论 #9261806 未加载
joshfarrant大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m a big fan of Slack, so hopefully this turns into something interesting.<p>Shameless plug: If you use Slack on Chrome my Chrome Extension, #Clicky, may be of some use to you, it&#x27;s the fastest way to share your current page to Slack!<p><a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/clicky-for-slack/bllgmdlgbbmijcoecbnmgeoekhebgmac" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;clicky-for-slack&#x2F;b...</a>
评论 #9262043 未加载
buro9大约 10 年前
What&#x27;s the privacy policy for Slack Chats?<p>I cannot find one on that domain, but I wonder if it&#x27;s the same as the one on Slack.com <a href="https://slack.com/privacy-policy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;slack.com&#x2F;privacy-policy</a> .<p>That policy isn&#x27;t aimed at protection of end user data, but rather at compliance with regulations around corporate communications.
评论 #9262047 未加载
评论 #9262008 未加载
mozillas大约 10 年前
What if HN would have been a private Slack Chat?
ChikkaChiChi大约 10 年前
This isn&#x27;t Slack; it&#x27;s a site created on <a href="http://postatic.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;postatic.com</a> which seems to be an online community generator.<p>I think the reason this is getting so much traction on HN is because of a false association.
mundanevoice大约 10 年前
Is it me or is it very very slow?
评论 #9261979 未加载
doomspork大约 10 年前
You should look into a 500 Internal Error page, right now you&#x27;re spitting out a stacktrace and code: <a href="http://www.slackchats.com/%3Ca%20href=" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slackchats.com&#x2F;%3Ca%20href=</a>
ishener大约 10 年前
I get 403 forbiden
评论 #9262106 未加载
Ono-Sendai大约 10 年前
If someone wants a website with realtime chatting, per subject, with snappy performance, then they can try my website: <a href="http://suprsede.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;suprsede.com&#x2F;</a> &lt;&#x2F;plug&gt;