TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facebook Messenger XMPP is going away

170 点作者 jwise0大约 10 年前

29 条评论

automathematics大约 10 年前
Also it is worth mentioning that Google Talk !== Google Hangouts<p>Everyone who uses XMPP&#x2F;iMessage&#x2F;Adium to connect to Google Talk is:<p>1) Apparently missing some messages from Hangouts users. Haven&#x27;t been able to track it down but it&#x27;s gotten me in trouble with my girlfriend a few times for &quot;ignoring her&quot;<p>2) Your friends see you as &quot;Online&quot; on hangouts and send you messages, which often seem to relate to #1 (you never see them).<p>This has been a nightmare for me over the last 2 years and I can&#x27;t stand how something as simple and SOLVED as chat protocol has been nuked and replaced with proprietary crap that thinks it&#x27;s impressive to announce a semantic MAJOR release update that touts &quot;Group Messaging&quot; as a major new innovation (I&#x27;m looking at you, Apple).<p>Ok, rant over. Take care my friends and let&#x27;s just switch everyone to IRC and be done with it.
评论 #9267147 未加载
评论 #9267140 未加载
评论 #9268564 未加载
评论 #9267065 未加载
评论 #9269807 未加载
评论 #9268646 未加载
评论 #9267171 未加载
评论 #9269793 未加载
评论 #9267055 未加载
jwise0大约 10 年前
A quick comment on why I submitted this ...<p>This will substantially change the way I interact with Facebook Messenger, and irritatingly so. For the past as long as I remember, all of my IM services have shown up in one client (naim; then Pidgin; then Adium). I&#x27;ll now be forced to either use the Facebook web client (and, in doing so, feed the mis-tuned reward system in my brain that stimulates itself from seeing the notifications icon light up ...) or use a poor approximation of a keyboard on my cell phone.<p>It&#x27;s irritating when a service that I use gets shut down. But, the thing that&#x27;s truly irritating to me is that I don&#x27;t even have the option of not using it: I&#x27;m locked in still by network effects, and Facebook know it.
评论 #9267395 未加载
评论 #9271460 未加载
AceJohnny2大约 10 年前
<i>Sigh</i>, yet another nail in the XMPP coffin, at least as far as the general public is concerned.<p>Remember when we had ICQ, and AIM, and MSN Messenger, and Gadu-Gadu, and we were dreaming of a unified messaging system?
评论 #9267292 未加载
评论 #9266917 未加载
评论 #9268222 未加载
评论 #9266979 未加载
评论 #9266972 未加载
评论 #9266941 未加载
评论 #9267124 未加载
zamalek大约 10 年前
Zuckerberg sure has been interesting this week:<p>&gt; Developers please use our platform!<p>&gt; Developers we are now going to obsolete any work you&#x27;ve done with the XMPP front-end.<p>Demonstrating a clear moving target is not how you attract developers, Facebook.
评论 #9268594 未加载
Steko大约 10 年前
We need two things. The first is a piece of software or robot that can just keep browser tabs open along with iMessage&#x2F;wechat clients whatever and then reads it and transfers any message that comes thru one of these locked down services to the second thing which is an open federated universal communication service&#x2F;app.<p>This app would have a slider at the top and if the slider is all the way on the left you get 1-1 messages&#x2F;mail from the most important people in your social network and all the way on the right you get 1 to many things of people you don&#x27;t even know but you follow on Twitter&#x2F;twitch&#x2F;youtube&#x2F;RSS&#x2F;tv shows you watch. This app makes money because people&#x2F;advertisers can pay to increase how close they are to you for one message and the money is split with the user who also sets the cost. So for a million dollars you could call Jay Z who might be sleeping but he&#x27;s making 500k so what the hell, sure he&#x27;ll listen to your demo.
评论 #9267346 未加载
ar7hur大约 10 年前
This is a 11-month old announcement:<p><pre><code> On April 30, 2014, we announced the deprecation of the XMPP Chat API as part of the release of Platform API v2.0.</code></pre>
jacquesm大约 10 年前
Everybody loves open standards until they are large enough to dictate their own.
niravs大约 10 年前
Alternative to your desktop client.<p><a href="http://www.goofyapp.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goofyapp.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #9267261 未加载
评论 #9267040 未加载
评论 #9267018 未加载
zobzu大约 10 年前
quick, deprecate all the things that are open.<p>the wave of openneness that started with the web is being extinguished everywhere. mind you, one could improve XMPP, or come up with an open alternative. But this is no longer the focus. Short term money and numbers is&#x2F;are the focus, as per pre-web companies.<p>This model always end up being bad for the masses of course, and only good for a few.
fenesiistvan大约 10 年前
Can anybody tell me, why the SIP chat protocol is so under used?<p><a href="https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3428.txt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ietf.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc3428.txt</a><p>-based on open standards (SIP)<p>-supported by most VoIP servers (so we have full interoperability between vendors such as Cisco, Huawei, Siemens, Voipswitch, Mizutech, Jitsi and others)<p>-simple and extendable<p>-lots of free services, free&#x2F;open source software. You can also host your own or integrate into your company PBX<p>In the previous years, we always see the same path for messaging applications:<p>1. Startup company add messaging based on open standards (SIP&#x2F;IRC&#x2F;XMPP&#x2F;other?)<p>2. One the company has significant user base, switches to a non-standard &#x2F; proprietary protocol<p>Already happened for Skype, Yahoo, Google, Facebook
评论 #9268314 未加载
评论 #9268400 未加载
dade_大约 10 年前
I only realized XMPP support was ending a month ago, I am not sure how I missed the notification but this just introduces a new way for me to miss messages. I think the writing is on the wall for XMPP, even Cisco is now working on Project Squared&#x2F; Spark and I expect will be killing off their Jabber software (The tone from their collaboration SMEs has become quite negative). Personally I believe WebRTC based technology can provide a much better user experience and more powerful capabilities than XMPP. Further, as a front end to SIP, it could be a great thing for interoperability, especially with PSTN. However, it really looks like it is being used as an excuse to create new walled gardens. Fortunately some carriers are migrating to IMS and provide softclients for computers, tablets and smart phones (Rogers One Number, and Telus Extend). This is the lowest common denominator, but I can chat with everyone with SMS as well as make phone calls from whatever device I choose. However, although technically possible, multiuser chat and presence is still not available. So here we are 20 years later, and chat is more fragmented than ever, but at least unlimited SMS is now common. AT&amp;T and Verizon are finally beginning migration to IP peering which opens the way for video calling over the PSTN. I think there is an opportunity for carriers here if they would get their act together. 6+ platforms (Skype, Hangouts, FB Messenger, iMessage, BBM, SMS) really doesn&#x27;t work for me.
kalessin大约 10 年前
That sucks, I really liked using Pidgin&#x2F;Adium with Facebook chat.
gwillen大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m curious why this article seems to have gotten flag-bombed off the front page:<p><a href="http://hnrankings.info/9266769/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hnrankings.info&#x2F;9266769&#x2F;</a><p>Is there something particularly un-newsworthy about this change?
评论 #9268449 未加载
rilita大约 10 年前
IRC was essentially created 25 years ago. In all that time we have still to make anything significantly better.<p>Why does a system with the following features not exist:<p>1. Requires all implementing servers and clients to support the full protocol<p>2. Allows users to communicate to users on other servers ( not just users within a server )<p>3. Has free client open source reference implementations for native use ( C or the like ) and some web language ( Python &amp; Dynamic JS )<p>3b. Has a free open source server reference implementation<p>4. Logging on the server indefinitely<p>5. Is always encrypted ( end to end via public keys, so that clear data never reaches the servers )<p>6. Offline messaging<p>7. Large file transfer with clean re-connection and continuation ( if neither party has a publicly accessible port, payment&#x2F;membership to the server would be required to facilitate the transfer... )<p>8. Random chat<p>9. Group chat<p>10. Utf8 for full multi-lingual use<p>11. Index of users for finding other users<p>If someone would just create such a thing it would put an end to all the stupid shifting from one system to another from year to year. I&#x27;m getting tired of switching systems and reverse engineering shitty protocols in order to continue doing the same thing with less features.
评论 #9270338 未加载
kshitijl大约 10 年前
A long time ago I worked on the modified ejabberd servers that provide this service. A shame indeed.
评论 #9267317 未加载
评论 #9267257 未加载
Havoc大约 10 年前
I wish the entire Messenger went away - nothing but an extra FB annoyance forced onto me.
评论 #9266949 未加载
miduil大约 10 年前
I just wanted to comment on how evil facebook is, but I&#x27;ve decided not to. I think there are enough people here who think the same. What facebook is doing is probably just an example of &quot;Embrace, Extend and Extinguish&quot; [0], though, I understand that their decision is not the same what microsoft did back then.<p>So to my point: Do you really think facebook is doing this only out of pure &#x27;evilness&#x27;. They were probably facing various of problems with XMPP, and already switched with their infrastructure from XMPP to their own &#x27;inventions&#x27;. If their own development is already proven to be working, they don&#x27;t have a reason to stay at the expensive XMPP protocol.<p>[1] &amp; [2]: I understand why XMPP can be nice to build into your applications (there&#x27;s even a social network based on XMPP), especially in the early stage, but when you go big - or mobile, I guess the &#x27;flaws&#x27; in the protocol are just becoming annoying (Disclaimer I&#x27;ve no clue what I&#x27;m writing about) I wonder why there is no better open protocol or standard for text chat, and if - how can we encourage facebook &amp; other giants to use it. I&#x27;m curious how tox [3] is going to do in near future. At the moment, it feels like XMPP is the only open chat solution, which no-one can touch since Pidgin, Adium &amp; Gajim are all broken (I&#x27;m still thankful for this tools!).<p>[0]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2069810" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=2069810</a><p>[2]: <a href="http://about.psyc.eu/Jabber#Technical_Issues_in_Jabber" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.psyc.eu&#x2F;Jabber#Technical_Issues_in_Jabber</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://wiki.tox.im/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.tox.im&#x2F;Main_Page</a>
评论 #9268746 未加载
评论 #9270785 未加载
jonalmeida大约 10 年前
To play devil&#x27;s advocate, what part of the XMPP protocol is dated, that doesn&#x27;t allow Facebook and Google to continue using it? Maybe if there&#x27;s a way to update XMPP to include features that shared amongst these services, they can fall back to using it?
评论 #9267090 未加载
评论 #9267138 未加载
评论 #9267095 未加载
评论 #9268416 未加载
评论 #9268452 未加载
0x0大约 10 年前
So this is how they make it a platform? :)
ipsum2大约 10 年前
Is there any other way to work with Facebook Chat, now that XMPP is gone?
评论 #9266927 未加载
评论 #9266912 未加载
评论 #9268744 未加载
jamespo大约 10 年前
Another stab between the shoulder blades for those of us who like to live in the command line.
edem大约 10 年前
Is there an alternative to Pidgin in this regard? I only use Facebook to chat with my friends (over Pidgin) and I don&#x27;t want to touch their website if possible.
评论 #9272529 未加载
dorfsmay大约 10 年前
Considering that they never opened it to federation, does it even matter?
评论 #9266966 未加载
评论 #9267049 未加载
klekticist大约 10 年前
Is there any alternative API? That is, if I&#x27;m interested in creating something that interacts with Facebook chat, am I now out of luck?<p>Thanks.
评论 #9268191 未加载
luxpir大约 10 年前
Note to those setting up new XMPP accounts: DuckDuckGo has a solid XMPP server[7] available for public use. They do their damnedest to protect privacy also, from what I understand.<p>That&#x27;ll be all.<p>--<p>[7] <a href="https://duck.co/blog/using-pidgin-with-xmpp-jabber" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;duck.co&#x2F;blog&#x2F;using-pidgin-with-xmpp-jabber</a>
vezycash大约 10 年前
If you &quot;follow the money,&quot; then this move makes sense. This is simply a move to display ads to every person using Facebook chat. (Facebook&#x27;s not happy that they couldn&#x27;t show ads to those of us using pidgin et al)
Podeau大约 10 年前
Let&#x27;s hope for an official desktop client of Messenger...
评论 #9268618 未加载
shmerl大约 10 年前
Another one turns sour. But FB server was never federated anyway, so good riddance.
pikzen大约 10 年前
Welp, time to register an account on jabber.org<p>I don&#x27;t really understand why they took the XMPP API to such lengths (it even displayed OTR messages as [encrypted message], that&#x27;s not really the kind of thing that comes to mind instantly when I think about an XMPP API) to finally deprecate it. Pidgin will probably see a sudden surge of bug reports.
评论 #9267037 未加载
评论 #9268259 未加载
评论 #9266969 未加载
评论 #9267204 未加载
评论 #9267061 未加载