TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How I doubled my Internet speed with OpenWRT

363 点作者 arkenflame大约 10 年前

21 条评论

jfroma大约 10 年前
I use this very same feature of openwrt to load balance between my two ISPs. Here in argentina neither of the two ISP are reliable, but cheap enought if you really use then and you need reliability. I recommend multiwan3 as the op suggest, other pkgs didnt work for me. Some modern routers have two radios for 2.5 and 5ghz, but even with one radio openwrt allows you to set it up as client and ap. I find other features of openwrt quite amazing like dnsmasq. It is a really powerful firmware.
评论 #9286794 未加载
评论 #9286415 未加载
CodeWriter23大约 10 年前
Xfinity says your wireline speed will not be impeded by others who are using WiFi via the xfinitywifi shared service. Since DOCSIS 3.0 has no limit on the maximum number of channels (source <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;DOCSIS#Bandwidth_tables" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;DOCSIS#Bandwidth_tables</a> ), I believe in order to make that claim, they have to allocate additional channels to the xfinitywifi traffic.<p>BUT OP will only double his bandwidth if he is purchasing a rate less than or equal to the actual realized throughput of his WiFi connection, somewhere from 50-90Mbps.<p>Additionally, all Cable modems have some kind of throttling because the speeds offered by ISPs (30x5, 100x8, etc.) are not evenly divisible by the per-channel rate of DOCSIS 2.0&#x2F;3.0 (38Mbps Down, 27Mbps up).<p>And then there&#x27;s this: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dslreports.com&#x2F;forum&#x2F;r29743167-Signals-Report-16-Downstream-Channel-Bonding-Here" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dslreports.com&#x2F;forum&#x2F;r29743167-Signals-Report-16-...</a>
评论 #9286257 未加载
评论 #9286668 未加载
TD-Linux大约 10 年前
I also have XfinityWifi. The box that provides it is extremely buggy. I recommend setting it to &quot;Bridge mode&quot; (which turns it into a dumb modem) and then using OpenWRT in a normal, router configuration. You get a really good speed boost, especially over wifi, just by taking Xfinity&#x27;s routing out of the equation.
sajal83大约 10 年前
Another way for &quot;bonding&quot; would be to use mptcp ( <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;multipath-tcp.org" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;multipath-tcp.org</a> ). You might need to patch and build openwrt yourself for it... The key difference is with mptcp each individual tcp connection uses both connections at the same time, rather than picking a lottery.<p>I blogged about my setup at <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sajalkayan.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;fun-with-mptcp.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sajalkayan.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;fun-with-mptcp.html</a>
评论 #9288375 未加载
m0skit0大约 10 年前
Am I the only one that sees missing letters?<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;s2.postimg.org&#x2F;vpba0a1wp&#x2F;image.png" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;s2.postimg.org&#x2F;vpba0a1wp&#x2F;image.png</a>
评论 #9286235 未加载
评论 #9286209 未加载
评论 #9286492 未加载
评论 #9286148 未加载
评论 #9289406 未加载
评论 #9286321 未加载
评论 #9286320 未加载
评论 #9286491 未加载
评论 #9286675 未加载
tkmcc大约 10 年前
Do xfinitywifi hotspots permanently authenticate clients based only on their MAC addresses? A malicious client could easily find the MAC address of any device connected to a xfinitywifi hotspot (by using e.g. airodump-ng [0]) and then spoof that device&#x27;s MAC address on their own computer to access the internet via the hotspot without any authentication.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aircrack-ng.org&#x2F;doku.php?id=airodump-ng" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aircrack-ng.org&#x2F;doku.php?id=airodump-ng</a>
评论 #9287759 未加载
评论 #9286269 未加载
评论 #9286673 未加载
gtwy大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m sorry but I can&#x27;t take the author&#x27;s advice on speed seriously when he&#x27;s using Comcast&#x27;s charge-you-every-month modem which is known to get terrible speeds to begin with. Let alone someone who is running wifi between their router and their modem.<p>If you want the fastest speeds on Comcast, pick up a DOCSIS 3 Motorola Surfboard modem. I&#x27;m paying for 100&#x2F;20. This is what I get with my surfboard <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.speedtest.net&#x2F;my-result&#x2F;4251868226" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.speedtest.net&#x2F;my-result&#x2F;4251868226</a>
评论 #9290008 未加载
0x0大约 10 年前
Doesn&#x27;t the xfinitiwifi inject ads MITM-style? I recall seeing some weird html overlays with xfinity ads on random web pages last time I browsed over one of these SSIDs.
评论 #9286014 未加载
评论 #9286069 未加载
评论 #9286868 未加载
mwsherman大约 10 年前
I don&#x27;t see any benchmarks, did I miss them? I suspect this doesn&#x27;t double bandwidth, the packets all end up over the same neighborhood network.<p>The only way it would increase bandwidth is if it evades artificial throttles. Having two connections to the same (neighborhood) pipe seems useless.
评论 #9285962 未加载
评论 #9286862 未加载
评论 #9286101 未加载
评论 #9286060 未加载
评论 #9287626 未加载
moron4hire大约 10 年前
So this works because you have neighbors who are also on Comcast and you can leach bandwidth from them?
评论 #9285887 未加载
评论 #9285864 未加载
评论 #9285884 未加载
评论 #9285873 未加载
评论 #9285906 未加载
andrewhillman大约 10 年前
I just had comcast to my home last week. I pay for 120 mbps but when connected via cat 5 it only reached 90 max mbps which would fine considering when using a wifi router it only reaches around 30 mbps. I have moved around the wifi router but it doesn&#x27;t make much of a difference. The technician told me the 120 mbps that I am being charged for is for for direct access and wifi won&#x27;t reach 120mbps. I complained to customer care saying if I go to the grocery store and pay for 120 items, I expect to get 120 items, not 30 items. I told them they should tell people upfront that 120 mbps is when you are plugged in directly since most people use a wifi router but this still doesn&#x27;t make sense to me since they can easily downgrade you to, say, 6 mbps without a problem.<p>Does anyone know if this OpenWRT works? I would love to push my speed to its limits. Comcast pretty much has a monopoly in my city and they are not very helpful.
评论 #9286176 未加载
评论 #9286170 未加载
评论 #9286601 未加载
评论 #9286213 未加载
aceperry大约 10 年前
Now that the op has published this workaround, I have the feeling that Comcast will take steps to stop this from happening. Comcast&#x27;s version of &quot;customer service.&quot;
chatmasta大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m surprised nobody has mentioned this in the thread but you can actually opt out of the xfinitiwifi thing. The deal is that you can use any of the hotspots if you have a comcast account and also share your router. If you opt out, you can no longer use the xfinitiwifi hotspots but nobody can use yours either.
评论 #9286186 未加载
评论 #9286296 未加载
评论 #9286303 未加载
评论 #9287515 未加载
评论 #9286465 未加载
评论 #9286533 未加载
logone大约 10 年前
Could something like this (two ISP connections) be combined to use the speed of both links at once (i.e. speed up a single connection). Perhaps with the aide of a remote VPS?
nrahnemoon1大约 10 年前
Very cool. In practice, unless you live next to a coffee shop, there&#x27;d almost never be anyone connected to your xfinity wifi network, so you&#x27;d get the full bandwidth anyhow. Although, if your neighbor has xfinity wifi, it&#x27;d be a smart way to leach off your neighbor&#x27;s bandwidth.<p>Also, because your router is a routed client of the xfinity wifi network, I&#x27;d imagine there&#x27;d be a big increase in latency. It&#x27;d be interesting to see the before&#x2F;after speed test results.
评论 #9285968 未加载
评论 #9285917 未加载
windexh8er大约 10 年前
What the author doesn&#x27;t realize is he&#x27;s doubled nothing. DOCCIS networks are shared mediums. That means you have to double bandwidth by increasing the number of channels you have. Newer DOCCIS modema are already bonding channels today. Most commonly 4 channel bond on the downstream and 2 on the up. By connecting to the cable modem twice, via two different routes, does nothing to change the available bandwidth available to the users behind the CPE (cable modem). As some have stated you could do this against your neighbors modem to share more channels on the cable media, however your neighbor is on the same HFC node and sharing the same available bandwidth to how many other users are connected to that node. You may get a few extra megabit but its the latency that will make that portion of the link &quot;slower&quot; so you really won&#x27;t improve things much, if at all.<p>The best way to improve consumer Internet connection is to get a fast router that can route fast <i>in hardware</i>. I&#x27;m always amazed people think a SOHO device doing WiFi, NAT, DHCP, DNS, etc. on gimped hardware is &quot;fast&quot;. The majority of time it&#x27;s not and real improvements can be realized with dedicates hardware. Meaning that until you split service off from routing using cheap, consumer SOHO gear, will most always be the bottleneck.
评论 #9286013 未加载
评论 #9286045 未加载
评论 #9286019 未加载
评论 #9286141 未加载
评论 #9286023 未加载
josh2600大约 10 年前
This is all well and good until you start doing anything with address sensitive replies. For example a VoIP call would need some way of anchoring the packets to a specific connection for the duration of the call (some kind of session pinning would be ideal).<p>I like the idea but I wonder how it performs on many use cases (like Skype or online gaming).
评论 #9285927 未加载
ausjke大约 10 年前
used openwrt for 8 years but never used this feature, looks cool. as a matter of fact I&#x27;m updating my home-router with newest openwrt head right now
late2part大约 10 年前
Awesome hack!
enraged_camel大约 10 年前
So it requires access to a second wireless network, as well as a router that supports OpenWRT <i>and</i> has two radios.<p>I don&#x27;t see anything particularly noteworthy here. He just happens to have a very specific setup and is leveraging it.
评论 #9285976 未加载
评论 #9286132 未加载
jebblue大约 10 年前
He&#x27;s connecting to his neighbor&#x27;s router seemingly without permission.<p>&quot;When you rent a cable modem&#x2F;router combo from Comcast (as one of my nearby neighbors apparently does)&quot;<p>It may be illegal:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Legality_of_piggybacking" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Legality_of_piggybacking</a><p>Comcast is not on the EFF&#x27;s list of Wireless Friendly ISP&#x27;s (referenced in the Wiki article):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;pages&#x2F;wireless-friendly-isps" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;pages&#x2F;wireless-friendly-isps</a><p>Even if it were: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;compnetworking.about.com&#x2F;od&#x2F;wirelessfaqs&#x2F;f&#x2F;legal_free_wifi.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;compnetworking.about.com&#x2F;od&#x2F;wirelessfaqs&#x2F;f&#x2F;legal_free...</a><p>&quot;Using a neighbor&#x27;s wireless access point may not be legal even with their permission. &quot;
评论 #9286378 未加载