TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Heroku Beta Pricing

130 点作者 jguimont大约 10 年前

25 条评论

topynate大约 10 年前
Link doesn&#x27;t work for me. From another source I found:<p>Free – Experiment in your own dev or demo app with a web and a worker dyno for free. Sleeps after 1 hr of inactivity. Active up to 12 hours a day. No custom domains. 512 MB RAM.<p>Hobby – Run a small app 24×7 with the Heroku developer experience for $7&#x2F;dyno&#x2F;mo. Custom domains. Run a maximum of one dyno per Procfile entry. 512 MB RAM.<p>Standard 1X, 2X: Build production apps of any size or complexity. Run multiple dynos per Procfile entry to scale out. App metrics, faster builds and preboot. All Hobby features. 512MB or 1GB RAM. $25 or $50&#x2F;dyno&#x2F;mo. ​<p>Performance – Isolated dynos for your large-scale, high-performance apps. All Standard features. Compose your app with performance and standard dynos. 6GB RAM. $500&#x2F;dyno&#x2F;mo.<p>H&#x2F;T <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;notes.ericjiang.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;881" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;notes.ericjiang.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;881</a>
评论 #9296231 未加载
评论 #9296277 未加载
评论 #9296155 未加载
erjiang大约 10 年前
I tried to post this yesterday[0] and fell off the new stories list, but such is HN.<p>Basically, they&#x27;re nerfing their free tier by charging $7&#x2F;month for a 24&#x2F;7 running app. People wanting to run a free app may look at App Engine or AWS&#x27;s one year free tier, or compare the price among other &quot;cloud&quot; and cloud-ish services.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;notes.ericjiang.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;881" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;notes.ericjiang.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;881</a>
评论 #9296442 未加载
评论 #9296183 未加载
评论 #9296263 未加载
practicalpants大约 10 年前
If Heroku actually does make the free tier unusable (12 hours a day availability), and if custom domains aren&#x27;t free anymore... then Heroku, time to part ways, and no more referrals to others.<p>This is the reason I chose Heroku as my platform in the first place over competitors, and if my experience is common, it worked out well for them because I have paid for premium tiers on certain apps along the way, and spoke glowingly of them to others.<p>I&#x27;m also still a little bitter that I incurred financial loss on one app because one of their quiet upgrades bonked Ruby 2.1.1 support, causing a big delay in a critical production push. (But I&#x27;m more annoyed that this will be about $100&#x2F;month cost for me to keep my lighter traffic personal apps on Heroku).
评论 #9296517 未加载
评论 #9296818 未加载
jagthedrummer大约 10 年前
Here&#x27;s an analysis of how these rumored changes will affect apps of various sizes.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.octolabs.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;octoblog&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;31&#x2F;analysis-of-the-rumored-heroku-pricing-changes&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.octolabs.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;octoblog&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;31&#x2F;analysis-o...</a><p>tl;dr : Current paying customers will see a discount of up to 30%. Current freeloaders will have to pay $84&#x2F;year for functionality equivalent to what they get now.<p>Anyone who is technical enough to use Heroku effectively can charge AT LEAST $84&#x2F;hour for their time, meaning that they&#x27;d need to move to a new solution in less than an hour to save money. All the hand wringing is very silly.
评论 #9298104 未加载
评论 #9297635 未加载
评论 #9297982 未加载
评论 #9296728 未加载
评论 #9296750 未加载
jk5_大约 10 年前
So, as a fellow hobbyist with 12 free dynos running on Heroku with custom domains, I clearly don&#x27;t want to pay $84 a month for apps that aren&#x27;t meant to generate revenue.<p>It is a sad day.<p>Where are you moving your side projects?<p>EDIT: I&#x27;m asking since I have no idea where I should go next. Heroku was a blessing.
评论 #9296875 未加载
评论 #9352909 未加载
评论 #9296916 未加载
评论 #9296758 未加载
评论 #9296686 未加载
评论 #9296645 未加载
jbrooksuk大约 10 年前
I understand why they&#x27;re doing this - companies have to make money - I get that.<p>I&#x27;m still annoyed with Heroku though. Cachet (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cachethq.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cachethq.io</a>) supports the &quot;Deploy to Heroku&quot; button. My experience is that their support is <i>terrible</i>. I&#x27;ve contacted them several times via; Twitter, email, GitHub and had no support from them in regards to this bloody button.<p>The reason I support Heroku in the first place is because of the free tier. It makes deploying your own instance of Cachet much easier. However, we&#x27;ve been having issues supporting it with Laravel 5&#x27;s environment configuration anyway, so this is the last drop in the bucket before I pull <i>native</i> Heroku support.<p>Our demo (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;demo.cachethq.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;demo.cachethq.io</a>) and our own status page (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;status.cachethq.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;status.cachethq.io</a>) are both hosted on Heroku with the &quot;Auto Deploy&quot; function, but only because it&#x27;s &quot;easy&quot; to do.
ekidd大约 10 年前
I totally support Heroku&#x27;s right to charge whatever they want, of course. They&#x27;re expensive, but they provide good value for the money.<p>Historically, I have a bunch of personal free-tier apps which sleep most of the time, and a couple which are up most of the time. My consulting clients, on the other hand, have paid Heroku thousands of dollars per month at various points. I also maintain a buildpack.<p>But at this point, it&#x27;s time I get off my backside, set up a docker host on EC2, and containerize the stuff I care about. I can probably pack everything onto a pretty small instance, and I&#x27;ve been meaning to deploy some non-HTTP services. Besides, it&#x27;s closer to what I&#x27;m using in production.<p>Thank you, Heroku, for some very enjoyable years, for top-notch paid service, and for the free hosting!
colinbartlett大约 10 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;cbartlett&#x2F;b5e932217d494bc6601c" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;cbartlett&#x2F;b5e932217d494bc6601c</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;PdZT3JQ.png" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;PdZT3JQ.png</a>
mark_l_watson大约 10 年前
I think this is great! I was never very comfortable with the free tier where apps are swapped out (leading to a long loading request time) after an idle period.<p>A low cost $7&#x2F;month plan for a dyno to always be running sounds good.
评论 #9297972 未加载
评论 #9297097 未加载
rascul大约 10 年前
Digital Ocean has a dokku image. Within a few minutes you could be running several apps for $5&#x2F;month.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;digitalocean.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;digitalocean.com</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;progrium&#x2F;dokku" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;progrium&#x2F;dokku</a>
ben_pr大约 10 年前
Can&#x27;t see it unless I login. Anyone care to post some details here?
评论 #9296234 未加载
jwilsco大约 10 年前
Why are people still surprised when free things become more restrictive. If you like a service, pay for it.
arikrak大约 10 年前
It seems they&#x27;re still offering a free tier for an app that doesn&#x27;t need to always be running. But if you need it running more than half the time, you need to pay at least $7&#x2F;month. Will this affect current customers?<p>I understand there were probably too many apps running on free tiers, and probably some that abuses the TOS as well. But with AWS and others having cut prices so much, shouldn&#x27;t Heroku also offer some kind of better discount?
ezegolub大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m kinda surprised that we haven&#x27;t seen a price decrease, since AWS keeps reducing prices. I can understand they wanting to decrease the &#x27;freeloaders&#x27;, but it seems shortsighted, those people are their future paying customers. Their new pricing makes it more economical to just get a small droplet from digitalocean, i&#x27;m surprised they chose to be above that point.
评论 #9296600 未加载
ddorian43大约 10 年前
I don&#x27;t see a change? Can you post the change ?
thesimon大约 10 年前
Can someone make a screenshot or give a description? Link redirects to main site
fiatjaf大约 10 年前
If you have only small apps running for free on Heroku, for $5 you&#x27;ll get them all hosted at DigitalOcean and Dokku easily as with Heroku: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitalocean.com&#x2F;community&#x2F;tutorials&#x2F;how-to-use-the-digitalocean-dokku-application" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitalocean.com&#x2F;community&#x2F;tutorials&#x2F;how-to-use-...</a>
sleepyhead大约 10 年前
As a paying customer I am glad that Heroku is cutting down on the free usage. They are using AWS so free usage means actual expenses. Sure, it can be seen as a marketing expense but Heroku is well known now and don&#x27;t really need it to gain awareness.
评论 #9296684 未加载
chipgap98大约 10 年前
Does anyone know when this new pricing starts? I have a free app on here that is only heavily used during certain parts of the year and I am about to hit that busy time and hope that this new pricing won&#x27;t take effect too soon.
petercooper大约 10 年前
This actually works out well for me since I don&#x27;t host any &quot;free&quot; projects there, but I suspect DigitalOcean will be deploying a whole ton of VPSes in the next month with the Dokku image running ;-)
mark_l_watson大约 10 年前
IBM is trying to build their hosting business. They offer a really generous free monthly tier on BlueMix. You can run a web app with a small data store for free.
评论 #9315945 未加载
评论 #9302086 未加载
jvanbaarsen大约 10 年前
I wonder if they will also change the pricing of the database tiers. Since paying 25$ for an 1x dyno and paying 50$ for a database just seems to be out of wack.
评论 #9296629 未加载
enginous大约 10 年前
I&#x27;m also interested in what has changed. The dyno-hour prices of $0.05, $0.10, $0.80 for 1X, 2X and PX, respectively, seem the same as before.
JorgeGT大约 10 年前
Goodbye then, and thanks for all the fish! =)
tmwh91大约 10 年前
Guess i&#x27;ll be moving my stuff off heroku then (no free custom domains!)