TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Intel SSD 750 PCIe SSD Review: NVMe for the Client

71 点作者 fraXis大约 10 年前

7 条评论

nitrogen大约 10 年前
The 1.2TB model uses <i>22 watts</i> for writing at 1200MB&#x2F;s (54MB per second per watt). I guess performance comes at a power cost.<p>As a comparison, the 1TB Samsung 850 Evo uses 5.7W maximum for writing at 520MB&#x2F;s (91MB per second per watt).
评论 #9313196 未加载
评论 #9313204 未加载
评论 #9313239 未加载
derekp7大约 10 年前
Does this remind anyone of the &quot;Hard Card&quot;, from Plus Development? They were 3.5&quot; hard drives mounted on an ISA card way back in the day. It&#x27;s funny how technology is sometimes cyclical.
评论 #9313997 未加载
评论 #9313436 未加载
mtanski大约 10 年前
Ugh, I really wish the marketing people would pick different name for this evolution of SSD drives then NVMe. At least the NVM part stating: Non-Volatile Memory.<p>The current iteration of what we call NVM is just SSD on PCIe busses so they are not bound by the speed of SATA&#x2F;SAS controllers.<p>Maybe it&#x27;s just me but when I think NVM I think of Non-Volatile Memory something like RAM that doesn&#x27;t go blank when you hit the power button. And like RAM can be mapped into (kernel or user) address space. And access to them go through processor caches (L2 or L3) strait into NVM.<p>The current SSD+ drives very much behave like the block devices of the old, just with a different host interface. Most importantly they can&#x27;t be directly memory mapped without going through the page cache. That still leaves a lot of performance on the table (double copy, requiring RAM for page cache versus working set).
评论 #9313744 未加载
评论 #9314234 未加载
评论 #9314970 未加载
imaginenore大约 10 年前
Why are PCIe SSD drives so much more expensive per GB compared to the SATA ones?<p>1TB SSD is now around $350-360 on Amazon.
评论 #9313389 未加载
vladtaltos大约 10 年前
idle power consumption: 4 Watts - way too much for my taste... I can understand it needing 22 Watts during high speed writes but why this much during staying idle ?<p>for comparison I checked my external 2TB WD Passport 0820 harddisk - it uses 2.11 Watts when streaming HD video...
评论 #9313463 未加载
rasz_pl大约 10 年前
Wow. Pretty me too product from Intel. They even priced and sized it to not clash with Samsung, because it has nothing to make you pick it over SM951.<p>Not to mention you can cram SM951 into a laptop.
tracker1大约 10 年前
Want!
评论 #9313303 未加载