TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Comparison of 5 Uniprocessor OS Scheduling Policies

27 点作者 silentbicycle大约 10 年前

2 条评论

silentbicycle大约 10 年前
The previous post: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spin.atomicobject.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;02&#x2F;26&#x2F;uniprocessor-scheduling-policies&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spin.atomicobject.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;02&#x2F;26&#x2F;uniprocessor-schedu...</a><p>and discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9112930" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9112930</a>
luckydude大约 10 年前
At the end of my day and tired, but why is this interesting? I can understand MP schedulers, I was super unhappy with the SGI scheduler back in the day, but MP schedulers are hard, you really don&#x27;t want to move processes away from their cache if you can avoid it.<p>Uniprocessor schedulers seem trivial by comparison.
评论 #9457220 未加载