TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Design in tech is stupid

1 点作者 graeham大约 10 年前

1 comment

coldtea大约 10 年前
&gt;<i>So unless you’ve had your head in the sand over the past year I’m sure you’ve noticed your day to day readings have become plagued with people proclaiming the importance of Design, particularly in the technology industry.</i><p>No, actually it&#x27;s the inverse. This trend has faded in the past 1-2 years. It&#x27;s like he&#x27;s ranting against grunge music in 1996.<p>&gt;<i>For instance, the cycling lights they featured prominently don’t cast sufficient light to ride in dark conditions, have a horrible attachment mechanism that doesn’t work on things that aren’t tubes, and apparently the battery mounts break easily. But you can lock them to your d-lock so you don’t have to walk around with your lights when you park your bike, so lets give them an award nomination even though they fail at their one primary function OF BEING LIGHTS.</i><p>That (and the other examples he gives) doesn&#x27;t prove that &quot;design in tech is stupid&quot;. Just that this product&#x27;s functional design is bad, and that its creators should have paid attention to the other necessary attributes for such a device.<p>Remember the &quot;Design is how it works&quot; thing et al. But even if we are to think of design as merely the &quot;cosmetic&quot; part, then again, given two functionaly identical products, with the same capabilities, people would pick the more nicely designed one over the cruder looking version. That&#x27;s because being pleasant to look at is also a feature (some people can&#x27;t understand that, but there are ancient, $500 billion &#x2F; year industries like fashion that work on this very principle, so it&#x27;s not like it&#x27;s some kind of passing fad).
评论 #9491735 未加载