TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The JustDecompile .NET decompiler engine has been open-sourced

102 点作者 jbevain大约 10 年前

5 条评论

exhilaration大约 10 年前
How does this compare to dotPeek from JetBrains? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;decompiler&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;decompiler&#x2F;</a>
评论 #9493001 未加载
评论 #9493269 未加载
taco_emoji大约 10 年前
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ilspy.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ilspy.net&#x2F;</a> is what I generally use. Functionally modeled after .NET Reflector.
userbinator大约 10 年前
A .NET decompiler written in .NET: I bet &quot;let&#x27;s try it on itself!&quot; was not an uncommon thought among its users already.<p>It wasn&#x27;t this one, but years ago I remember using a decompiler to look through things like the system libraries and the (relatively few) apps written in it at the time, and it was quite interesting how much metadata was available (if it hadn&#x27;t been obfuscated). I think it&#x27;s fun and enlightening to take things apart, see how they work, and modify them, so that aspect of .NET really appealed to me, but I still prefer native code for its efficiency and succinctness...
评论 #9494329 未加载
评论 #9493827 未加载
评论 #9492898 未加载
ThinkBeat大约 10 年前
With the release of Roslyn wont writing things like these be a lot easier?
DevKoala大约 10 年前
This tool helped a lot back then. I would also use DotPeek.