TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Cloud Bigtable

16 点作者 dsymonds大约 10 年前

2 条评论

mark_l_watson大约 10 年前
Good idea using the HBase apis. Internally, Google storage is very reliable because of multiple cell replication. That said, as convenient as it would be to hand off data storage to a vendor, it would feel a little strange to have one&#x27;s company so dependent on a third party like Google. Same concerns over relying on SimpleDB or Azure table storage.<p>For personal storage I replicate on Microsoft and Google&#x27;s offerings but at large scale the cost of replication between vendors would be huge.
ziahamza大约 10 年前
I am not sure why they modelled their pricing model on a per node basis rather then the total data storage. I guess the nodes will be isolated from every other cluster, but that makes the initial price to setup a cluster a lot higher then lets say using Azure Table storage.