What you'd build if you had 100 millions?

I read Jared Diamond's book "Collapse" a few years ago and it certainly is a sobering book. I would agree with its thesis that we face a distinct possibility of our high tech "Western" society crashing - and due to the Threads linking us together this crash could be pretty hard.<p>I would use the 100 million to investigate possible ways of mitigating the effects of such a crash. As the actual causes would be essentially unpredictable I'd pass on that effort and concentrate on what we could do to establish a degree of continuity of core areas of knowledge: maths, medicine, geography etc.<p>One option would be to build bunkers full of useful books in remote locations (like the gene bank in the Svalbard). However, a better way might be to build a long lasting organisation set apart from our culture - very much like secular versions of medieval monasteries or the mathic concents in Neal Stephenson’s excellent Anathem.

Prototype vertical farms. It's my new obsession.<p>The UN projects that arable land will decline to 1/3 acre per person by 2050 (down from 1 acre/person in 1970). I'd buy up a few old mill buildings (they're all over New England, where I live), and convert them to combination indoor farms using hydroponic or aeroponic growing systems, living space (for farmers), and retail space (to sell the food to the community and offer sales space to other local farmers).<p>I'd use the roof for combination solar, additional green space, and rain catchment.

I would establish a huge prize for finding the most efficient way to teach the principles of rational thinking and economics to society. And then I'd spend the rest of the money on establishing that teaching method so that everyone can benefit, regardless of prior education or status. This will lead to a better society.

Judging from my very own current problems, I guess I'd start to support small universities and support promising young students, especially if they study some sort of had science like physics, math, computer science and such.<p>Such support should include money (well, students need food, books, other equipment depending on the course), but I think it should also include support with various buerocratic problems, like facing the german bafoeg-institute and other buerocrats.<p>Certainly, it will be hard to actually get a good selection principle going and it also needs a plan to get the money back, but once this is done, I think this is a very valuable thing to invest in. I mean, studying is pretty much a full time job (well, if you study hard to get through the universiy fast, it is), and thus, students usually don't have that much time to work and sometimes they even get to pay for being at the university.<p>Besides that, I would invest a large sum into neurodermatism research, just for pure egoism. I have this problem, and whoever also has this problem knows how bad this status can be whenever it goes active. (To everyone else: Just imagine the urge to scratch your inner elbow, hand or other inappropiate locations until every skin is gone and just a bloody mess is left. After that, one is depressed, cannot move properly and is in pain.) Thus, this would be a second major investment. I guess it also would not be that egoistic, as a lot of people could benefit from results from this research :)

I'd try and find a mothballed oil platform, buy it for cheap and renovate it into a luxury hotel with luxury apartments and market it to celebrities as a way to completely avoid the paparazzi and to a wealthy client list. Bars, nightclubs, restaurants and casino's would be there from the start to help clear out people's pockets. It would be self-sustaining with gardens and hydroponics, wind power and eventually wave power, both of which could be sold back to shore to decrease maintenance costs.<p>If it failed, so what, it would advance the idea of seasteading. If it succeeded I'd attempt to expand the platform, or build another platform within about 3km, so that the platforms could be connected with existing gondela technology.<p>The idea of seasteading has always fascinated me, but to make it carbon-neutral or even better carbon-negative (encouraging coral growth around the bases, out putting power to onshore communities, etc.) would send an environmental message that the people who care about the environment aren't just a bunch of witless nags at greenpeace but are people who actually want to change the <i>whole</i> world into something better. This environmental message could be capitalized on during expansion phases and used to attract businesses.<p>In theory you would become a monopolic supplier of all goods. Food, power, housing, transport, would all be owned by your company meaning you can attain income from all aspects of the business and keep it profitable. By keeping the market open, it makes you look friendly and open (consider you own the transportation, so anyone competing with you and winning is still paying you money).<p>In 40 years time I would be a James Bond-esque supervillain and precisely where I want to be before retirement.

A huge airship — just the first of many. The first would probably be capable of lifting around 400 tons, but subsequent airships could be made larger and more efficient.<p>Yes, I'm being absolutely serious. I'm part of a group of people trying to get this done currently, and a lot of research has been done.<p>There have recently been a few companies who have tried and failed at this for various reasons, but we think it definitely can be done and we want to be the ones to do it.<p>Anyone have $100,000,000?

An accountability website for voting records from city to state to national (in that order given that often enough local legislation has a more direct impact on the average citizen's life than national). The site would cross reference stated platforms of politicians vs their actual voting actions as transparently analyzed by up to 3 university poli sci and history professors one each from conservative / liberal / historial context point of view. The site would also track budgetary spending and hours worked / where worked per politician to provide metrics to the voting populace on who's doing their job, who's doing their job as they said they would.<p>Primary goal, to provide transparent and <i>neutral</i> public information to voters to enable them to make an actual <i>choice</i> when voting instead of lock stepping according to the current PR spin of any specific party. Secondary goal would be to complement local efforts to increase voting awareness.<p>Public servants should be under the same metric driven scrutiny by their employers as any other employee for any private company.

I'd build a research institute for mathematics and computer science.<p>If I had to build something technical, I'd build a secure realtime BSD kernel.

I would probably start filming low-budget cyberpunk movies for the hardcore viewer, since i don't have to make a profit, a cult-following is the aim. But not the "this movie is so bad its fun" type of cult following, i want the "this movie is really obscure and deep, but still entertaining, too bad none of my friends have herd of it" type. Im aiming at the Nirvana type, not the Johny Mnemonic type of film.If i actually DO make a profit, i might do a steam-punk movie :D I have NO experience or knowledge of movie making, so chances are i will fail and my films would become ideal for bad movie nights.<p>Alternatively I'll donate the money to someone who can actually use it to make something great.

I'd build a college, maybe only inviting 500 students at a time or something and hire the best professors paying the highest salaries and see what happens.<p>Of course the college would be super selective, but it would be a breeding ground for awesomeness.

A University strictly dedicated to IT/CS related studies that was actually in it to teach, innovate, and research rather than turn a profit.<p>And the distance learning department would not use Blackboard, we'd open source our own platform.

I would implement a "system" in the "franchise prototype" sense of the word that allows radiologists and cardiologists (they read nukes, echos, and CT's) to sit at any PC in the world and just analyze studies whenever they get a chance (or all day if that's what they want to do.)<p>I would use the rest of the money (there would be a LOT leftover) to send teams of techs with portable equipment to poor areas and then inject these studies into the radiologist's work queues so they get analyzed for free.<p>I think this could be a self-sustaining system where the profits from reading studies could pay for the charity work.

If you're offering, I'll take you up on it. :)<p>I am interested in both robotics and agriculture, specifically small scale agriculture such as home hydroponics and container gardening. I would create a company based on the idea of combining the two fields in order to help bring technology and automation to the process of growing healthy food in limited spaces.

I would assemble a team to try and replicate several scientific experiments that have came out with inexplicable results. While a large number of those will turn out fraudulent, it is very possible that a few claims were true, but sounded so outlandish that they were considered fake right away.

I'd build a sustainable commune on a massive scale, using advanced aquaponics, greenhouses, alternative energy sources, and digital information sharing. This would hopefully serve as an example to inspire others to build their own sustainable projects.

Personal crash safety suit for motorcyclists/extreme sports which could absolutely protect against all damage. I have ideas, which could be applied to other applications, anyone have the $100,000,000?

I'd be uncomfortable with 100 million I did not earn. I'd like to think I would say, no thanks. Instead, I would probably come up with some justification for why I am suitable to control this very large investment.<p>(You could argue that, given luck, a lot of people receive $100 million without really "earning" it. That may be the case, but that would probably make me uncomfortable also. However, as in the previous case, I'd still delude myself into thinking I earned it by foresight, brilliant investment, or mettle.)

Bribe the hell out of an education system (in any bribeable country) to make heavy use of modern psychology, esp. critical reasoning skills.

Louis C.K. has ideas:<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95fNgx8aCS8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95fNgx8aCS8</a>

build a large solar power plant in some desert - will make the money back very soon. additionally, if sea is near, add a desalination plant and create a nice oasis - will bring people and reclaim desert territory - another constructive way to increase the ROI.<p>ps: if youre asking for inspiration because you actually got the money, dont forget to gimme a share ;]

I'd invest in 5000 promising new startups.

An extra-solar planet imager (telescope or satellite) and a nuke powered exploration probe to check things out.

OLPC - only better and completely free.

A news organization for long-term thinking, reporting and analysis. Essentially a News of the Long Now.

I'd build a biotech-biogerontology institute for the SENS Foundation and Aubrey de Grey.

<a href="http://singinst.org/donate/" rel="nofollow">http://singinst.org/donate/</a>

I'd build a rollercoaster.

I would Invest all of it in an Alternative Fuel research.

Distributed mesh wireless + solar energy.

<i>really</i> nice house.

I would invest it in startups. Which is the best way to foster innovation and job growth.

I'd start a Bank.

I don't need $100 million. I need more like $100,000. That would be enough to pay off all my debts and let me walk away from my job and pursue what I really want to do full time. Building better lifestyles and spreading a different "culture"/ideas doesn't really take much money per se. And a better way of life/better way of thinking/better culture is the only thing you can build that scales well (with the current global population) and doesn't run into a brick wall concerning consumerism butting heads with ecological fragility.<p>But if I just had to spend $100 million, I think I'd go with distributed, green power.

I'd hire someone to create a software filter to sort out crap posts like this one.

I would build a gold statue of me

Robots, lots of big robots :) So what I do now but more so...

I would build a giant Ark to save us all from 2012 apocalypse, unlike Roland Emmerich who had saved, few of us in his f<i></i>*ing movie ;)

Are you serious? You failed your first start-up, how come do you want someone to give you 100 millions.<p>"This person is very powerful and you cannot possibly cheat"<p>When the project is big, cheating become easier<p>"but you don't have to make a profit off your product either"<p>What's the benefit of your work then?