TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The World Religions Tree (huge visualization)

78 点作者 dirtyaura大约 10 年前

28 条评论

ars大约 10 年前
This is very inaccurate. It invents splits in Judaism (for example) that simply don&#x27;t exist.<p>For example it has a bizarre split of Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai and even more bizarrely continues the lines to modern times as if there are actually two separate branches.<p>When the parts that I know best are inaccurate, it seems likely to me that everything else will be just as bad.
评论 #9521741 未加载
评论 #9522112 未加载
fastball大约 10 年前
Is Greek &#x2F; Roman &#x2F; Norse mythology (basically everything Western that isn&#x27;t Christianity) not considered religion? Because maybe I&#x27;m just blind but I can&#x27;t seem to find those anywhere in the tree.
评论 #9521464 未加载
评论 #9521665 未加载
评论 #9521454 未加载
bennettfeely大约 10 年前
This is interesting, but you would be naive if you think this is in any way comprehensive or accurate.<p>My religion and main area of knowledge of Catholicism shows a limited number of picked and chosen orders of priests, (i.e. Franciscans, Cistercians, Capuchins). These are not separate religions by any means whatsoever; they are all members of the Catholic faith. They certainly don&#x27;t belong on a chart that is meant to display different religions and schisms.
评论 #9521988 未加载
评论 #9521899 未加载
kiliancs大约 10 年前
Nice visualization! I feel like there&#x27;s room for many improvements both technically and in accuracy, though.<p>For example, the Bahá&#x27;í Wold Center is not a branch, though. It&#x27;s just the spiritual and administrative center of the Bahá&#x27;í Faith [0][1]. Likewise, the Universal House of Justice [2][3] is the supreme governing institution of the Bahá&#x27;í Faith (and its seat is located at the Bahá&#x27;í World Centre), so it&#x27;s not a branch either.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bwc.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bwc.org&#x2F;</a><p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%AD_World_Centre" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%AD_World_Centre</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;universalhouseofjustice.bahai.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;universalhouseofjustice.bahai.org&#x2F;</a><p>[3] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Universal_House_of_Justice" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Universal_House_of_Justice</a>
egwynn大约 10 年前
This could be awesome, but instead it falls very flat. If the author is reading this, I think my advice boils down to:<p><pre><code> 1. Cite sources 2. Make it an SVG</code></pre>
评论 #9521952 未加载
madengr大约 10 年前
Nice chart. Glad to be an atheist. Now imagine the man-millenia wasted on all that hocus pocus.<p>Anyway, you are here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;WNkmN.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;WNkmN.jpg</a>
评论 #9521986 未加载
评论 #9521744 未加载
评论 #9521947 未加载
评论 #9521701 未加载
评论 #9521913 未加载
评论 #9521638 未加载
DrinkWater大约 10 年前
I checked some random branches and found a lot of errors and inaccuracies. Nice visualization though
评论 #9521588 未加载
31reasons大约 10 年前
Krishnamurti Foundation is not at all about religion. In fact Jiddu Krishnamurti was completely against any dogma to the point where he asked people to not even follow his words. And they still made it part of the Hinduism branch, which is funny.
kghose大约 10 年前
I always thought Buddhism was an off-shoot of Hinduism - a kind of cleaned up version by the Buddha, who was born Hindu.
FiReaNG3L大约 10 年前
Anyone knows what software was used to make the visualization?
transfire大约 10 年前
Early history provided is not very accurate. And it is missing religions not generally believed any more.
panglott大约 10 年前
This is less &quot;inaccurate&quot; than fundamentally conceptually flawed. Human ideological systems are not like biological systems that speciate through schism. They are creations of living human minds and societies that piece together ideas that they find meaningful and useful.<p>So this chart lists a couple of major sources: Chinese folk Taoism, Japanese mythology, Shramana traditions (non-vedic), Early Vedic period, and Ancient Israelite religion. Most of these traditions have been cross-pollinating, merging, and re-dividing for millenia. Yet this kind of visualization can only depict schism, not influence.
评论 #9525947 未加载
A_COMPUTER大约 10 年前
If they wanted to they could break off LDS into LDS, Reorganized LDS&#x2F;Community of Christ, and FLDS, and Church of Christ Temple Lot, as well as a handful of defunct schisms like Strangite.
caipre大约 10 年前
Some sort of minimap for navigation would be useful. Also a zoom, the text is a bit small for my eyes.<p>Edit: browser zoom works well. There&#x27;s a legend in the lower left.
评论 #9521571 未加载
droithomme大约 10 年前
It is astonishingly bizarre that this so called tree focuses only on a small number of recent religions and their sects and orders.<p>There are thousands of religions not represented, most significantly older than the oldest concrete points on this graph.<p>I do recognize though that this focuses on fairly modern religions of the last two millennia. Still, what a small, narrow, and uninteresting group of beliefs that is.
ryan-c大约 10 年前
The site may go down entirely for a moment... This site belongs to my friend Alex Fink.<p>Edit:<p>Mods, please adjust link to point to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;000024.org&#x2F;religions_tree&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;000024.org&#x2F;religions_tree&#x2F;</a><p>I&#x27;ve done an emergency move of the images to another server that&#x27;s better able to handle the load and re-written the image links (I host his site).
评论 #9521694 未加载
poizan42大约 10 年前
The Ethiopian Jews do not observe Hanukkah, which would indicate that they split of from the rest of the Jews earlier than 167 BC.<p>Also &quot;Ancient Isrealite Religion&quot; should probably be &quot;Ancient Caananite Religion&quot;. And a lot of things happened there before 500 BC - such as Yahweh becoming the dominant deity and King Hezekiah forbidding the worship of any other gods.
Cogito大约 10 年前
Couldn&#x27;t see it linked anywhere yet, but the original OpenMap version is at<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;funki.com.ua&#x2F;ru&#x2F;portfolio&#x2F;lab&#x2F;world-religions-tree&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;funki.com.ua&#x2F;ru&#x2F;portfolio&#x2F;lab&#x2F;world-religions-tree&#x2F;</a>
评论 #9522009 未加载
willf大约 10 年前
The Anabaptist&#x2F;Baptist branches are also pretty inaccurate.
SocksCanClose大约 10 年前
Looking at this, I can&#x27;t help but see a few original Gits, forking into hundreds, then thousands of moral software programs, installed across human history.
afsina大约 10 年前
I think there are many inaccuracies. Many branches are dead but seems to be alive. Some branches are actually should not be separated. Nice try tough.
vorg大约 10 年前
The 4 most numerous religious groupings by number of followers in the world are each color-coded in the popular mind:<p>* Green for Islam<p>* Red for Hinduism<p>* Yellow for Buddhism<p>* Blue for Christianity
firepoet大约 10 年前
Question for the author: Where is Shambhala Buddhism? It emerged from the Kagyupa and Nyingmapa branches of Tibetan Buddhism.
neaanopri大约 10 年前
Where is Manichaenism?
jplur大约 10 年前
(for Europe and Asia)
jonloldrup大约 10 年前
Who made this?
cjsthompson大约 10 年前
As expected, European native beliefs (and their link to hinduism) are not even mentioned.
评论 #9522122 未加载
FrankenPC大约 10 年前
Wow. Nice taxonomic work.<p>It sure is a good thing there is only one true religion eh? &#x2F;s