This "coding scheme" seems to be "unkillable" (don't know, if the wording is correct, the spell checker does not like it).<p>I thought, after Microsoft made a bad name about itself by using this in its "Access" product ten years ago or so (they "encrypted" passwords this way), some people should have been warned. May be it is was just to long ago ...<p>Within seven years or so (of operating), somebody could have come up with a different algorithm ...