TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Relicensing Dolphin: The long road to GPLv2+

69 点作者 mparlane将近 10 年前

4 条评论

Ruud-v-A将近 10 年前
I think it is a mistake to license anything under a “or later version” license. If you do that, you licence your code under a license that you have never read, so how can you know that it serves your intentions? You are blindly licensing code under a licence that has yet to be written!<p>In the GPL case, the Free Software Foundation states that “The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and&#x2F;or new versions of the GNU General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.” (Section 14 of the GPLv3.) Now of course I don’t expect the FSF to publish something radically different, but they _could_ do so. Even if you trust the FSF now, are you sure you trust the FSF twenty years from now?
评论 #9600726 未加载
评论 #9600524 未加载
评论 #9600446 未加载
评论 #9600685 未加载
评论 #9600606 未加载
评论 #9600853 未加载
jordigh将近 10 年前
&gt; In practice, GPLv3 only adds more restrictions to the license<p>Not at all. They say so themselves: GPLv3 adds compatibility with Apache v2, which GPLv2 lacks. This thus removes a restriction.<p>GPLv3 also clarifies some things from GPLv2, such as being explicit about being applicable not only to software, and giving a clearer meaning of what distributing software means. GPLv3 calls this &quot;conveying&quot;.
评论 #9600166 未加载
song将近 10 年前
I&#x27;m wondering about those 0.5% who refused to relicense. What would be the rational behind refusing such a change. I can understand refusing for a project to be relicensed under a very different license but not between GPLv2 and GPLv2+...
评论 #9600204 未加载
评论 #9600113 未加载
评论 #9600131 未加载
评论 #9600132 未加载
评论 #9600146 未加载
评论 #9600115 未加载
foldor将近 10 年前
How come there was no mention of the upcoming OSVR partnership as one of the final straws to push forward with this change?