TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

World without end

132 点作者 nqureshi将近 10 年前

13 条评论

bane将近 10 年前
I always feel like games like this die in the late-game. Once you&#x27;ve had fun with the exploring and are collecting resource units for the nth millionth time, the game kind of runs its course.<p>It would be far more interesting if, as you play, you can participate in a large economy, slowly growing your gameplay experience out from say, a single guy mining and selling minerals on a planet, to an galactic empire.<p>Even better if you could participate at just about any part of the virtual economy, buying, selling, crafting, shipping, policing, fighting, robbing, pirating. You could own a store on a space station or a repair shop, make enough and buy a ship, or buy a station. Now you&#x27;re managing station ops.<p>Exploration is just one of the X&#x27;s in 4x, and I feel like there&#x27;s so much untapped potential in the genre.
评论 #9604018 未加载
评论 #9602897 未加载
评论 #9603043 未加载
评论 #9602835 未加载
testguy34将近 10 年前
The hype around this game reminds me of the hype around Spore a decade ago (it didn&#x27;t live up to it).
评论 #9602228 未加载
评论 #9602117 未加载
评论 #9603595 未加载
Mithaldu将近 10 年前
Games like these come from amazingly humble beginnings:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=SDNMTnXoG9M" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=SDNMTnXoG9M</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aTJFChB5wyY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aTJFChB5wyY</a>
评论 #9602189 未加载
评论 #9602732 未加载
lovemenot将近 10 年前
&gt;&gt; Murray’s primary coding contribution is to planetary terrain, and he had developed a special appreciation for such formations.<p>So Slartibartfast then: &quot;[Norway] was one of mine. Won an award, you know. Lovely crinkly edges.&quot;
jpatokal将近 10 年前
The trailer, which the New Yorker is too old school to link to: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3gQi2bv1DHg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3gQi2bv1DHg</a>
评论 #9602561 未加载
smegel将近 10 年前
&gt; using money he raised by selling his home<p>Holy cow, that&#x27;s a brave move!
aluhut将近 10 年前
I wish he could join this up with Elite Dangerous. Elites space environment is pretty impressive and if it needs something, then a proper surface-dimension.
hyperpallium将近 10 年前
The strength of this is its weakness: because the worlds are generated procedurally, they cannot contain dependencies between the elements of the world, unless they have been specified in the formula. The article gives a good example, of how a river can&#x27;t emerge from the slopes of the terrain - instead, you have to encode the river as part of the terrain. It&#x27;s not emergent. It&#x27;s analytical, not numerical.<p>They can still have a sophisticated generation method, which does encode several different features, that can co-occur in unexpected ways, but it can&#x27;t be a deep interaction. In effect, the designers are exploring the space of equations for world generation. The advantage is they can have billions of planets without storing them or expensively generating them. Analytical solutions are extraordinarily efficient - it&#x27;s just a formula, you punch in the seed and you&#x27;re done. No iteration or search.<p>In the videos I&#x27;ve seen, the planets all look alike, just different shapes and colours for trees, grass, terrain.<p>Still, I admire their dream and fervor and hope it&#x27;s more interesting than I expect.
starshadowx2将近 10 年前
I still haven&#x27;t seen any comparisons of this game with Mirrormoon EP, which seems a lot alike to me.<p>You could fly through space to any of the stars you see, it was procedurally generated planets, bright artistic colour design choices, etc.<p>The only thing that seems different is the much more content and actual realism in No Man&#x27;s Sky.
putlake将近 10 年前
There are theories that our own universe is more likely to be a simulation than &quot;real&quot;. e.g. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.simulation-argument.com&#x2F;simulation.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.simulation-argument.com&#x2F;simulation.html</a>
GaiusCoffee将近 10 年前
“So, annoyingly, by doing it wrong you get a nicer effect,”<p>Realism vs Cinematics :&#x2F;
spectrum1234将近 10 年前
Amazing. This will be the first video game that I&#x27;ve played in a long time.
spectrum1234将近 10 年前
THIS GAME IS GOING TO CHANGE THE WORLD