My company has just launched an anonymous interview process for 3 open positions - <a href="https://careers.bytemark.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">https://careers.bytemark.co.uk/</a> . We only take a mobile# and an alias, and just talk to candidates over IM for 2/3 interviews. I blogged about the rationale - <a href="https://blog.bytemark.co.uk/2015/05/20/bytemark-is-hiring-by-anonymous-interview" rel="nofollow">https://blog.bytemark.co.uk/2015/05/20/bytemark-is-hiring-by...</a><p>re: the post on gapjumpers, I'm not sure about asking someone to do (what appears to be) a 1-2 day programming exercise on their own time to prove themselves for a job. That favours people with the most time to put aside - and it's a heck of a lot of wasted effort for the candidate who gets rejected. I don't think that's as fair as it should be.<p>We're using anonymous interviews for all our positions (not just development), and it's great to get a sense of personality without thinking about gender, age, race or anything else irrelevant. When we turn people down, we don't even know who they were. I _think_ that's a good thing for both sides.<p>I'm not going to pre-judge what's happening with our process, but so far we've got through a load of interviews without stress, and got very strong impressions from these 30 minute initial chats. Second interviews will start happening the week after next & I'll write about it once we've got this batch of recruits through the door.