TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China’s stock market bubble: A goring concern

91 点作者 dons将近 10 年前

6 条评论

smaili将近 10 年前
&gt; Kemian Wood Industry, which used to boast of the quality of its composite floorboards, took radical steps to deal with the downturn. It switched its focus to online gaming and changed its name.<p>&gt; A hotel group rebranded itself as a high-speed rail company, a fireworks maker as a peer-to-peer lender and a ceramics specialist as a clean-energy group.<p>I&#x27;ve heard of pivoting, but this goes way beyond that. Doing a complete 180 on what you&#x27;re producing&#x2F;selling and changing your name? That&#x27;s both fascinating and scary at the same time. As a customer, how do you know whether the company you&#x27;re buying from will still be around?
评论 #9639732 未加载
评论 #9639329 未加载
评论 #9644058 未加载
评论 #9640846 未加载
kenny-log_ins将近 10 年前
I find myself noticing that a lot of the solutions that The Economist proposes are very similar - opening markets, decreasing regulation - make everything more &quot;liberal&quot;. They always make compelling arguments for their suggestions but I also find myself wondering whether they ever argue for any alternative
评论 #9637896 未加载
评论 #9637751 未加载
评论 #9638178 未加载
评论 #9638414 未加载
评论 #9637776 未加载
评论 #9637839 未加载
kcorbitt将近 10 年前
&gt; Global investors are not buying into the mania: the shares of companies listed in both Hong Kong and Shanghai are now 30% more expensive in the latter.<p>I&#x27;m quite confused by this statement -- if the shares on both exchanges are equivalent, this seems like an insanely good arbitrage opportunity. Are China&#x27;s capital controls really tight enough to prevent Chinese nationals from finding a way to invest in the same stocks on the HK index for a 30% discount? And even if they are, I&#x27;m not clear <i>why</i> the Chinese government would do this -- it&#x27;s like charging a 30% premium to domestic investors just for being Chinese.
评论 #9637883 未加载
评论 #9638090 未加载
评论 #9643485 未加载
评论 #9638117 未加载
评论 #9637939 未加载
kordless将近 10 年前
I may be completely off about this, but isn&#x27;t it the term suppose to be &quot;going concern&quot;? I thought I had discovered a phrase I didn&#x27;t know, but then I did a Google search and the only occurance is this article.<p>That said, if China&#x27;s market goes under it may be pretty gory. :)
评论 #9639436 未加载
评论 #9639415 未加载
评论 #9640540 未加载
评论 #9639426 未加载
dmix将近 10 年前
&gt; A shift to monetary easing and fiscal stimulus—and expectations of more to come—help explain why the rally began. But the longer it continues, the more it looks like irrational exuberance.<p>The spark that started it all?<p>This is crazy:<p>&gt; Credit Suisse estimates that 6-9% of China’s market capitalisation is funded by credit, nearly five times the average in the rich world.
评论 #9651690 未加载
amelius将近 10 年前
If companies are worth more than what they make in revenue, stock-holders should be penalized for illegal gambling.
评论 #9639128 未加载