TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Guess Who Doesn’t Fit in at Work

4 点作者 AshFurrow将近 10 年前

2 条评论

7402将近 10 年前
The emphasis on cultural fit seems so strange to me, since when I was hiring I wanted cultural <i>diversity</i>, not cultural fit. I did want everyone to have technical ability, communication skills and &quot;character,&quot; by which I meant honesty, open-mindedness, positive attitude, and ability to focus on work. But beyond that, I saw putting a programming team together like making a goulash: you want a variety of ingredients and flavors to make it come out right:<p>* Some programmers like following and trying out the latest and greatest tools ands versions; some like sticking with solid and established tools. * Some like knowing a little about everything. Some like knowing a lot about one thing. * Some like using databases for everything. Some avoid them. * Some like polishing and optimizing code. Some like rapid prototyping. * Some <i>enjoy</i> writing documentation. Some don&#x27;t. * Some work at night. Some work early in the morning. * Some are extroverts. Some are introverts.<p>And I was happy to have a mix of all of them.<p>And as for whether they liked playing video games, knitting sweaters, playing softball, going to church, drinking beer, hunting deer, or reading science fiction or anything else, not only didn&#x27;t I care about that, I felt it was ethically wrong to base hiring decision on what they did outside of work.
potench将近 10 年前
Perhaps calling it &quot;culture fit&quot; is the problem - it&#x27;s not specific enough. Define more clearly the characteristics and signals you&#x27;re looking for. Evaluate your team and culture to better identify the characteristics you&#x27;re trying to match in a candidate. For instance, instead of &quot;culture fit&quot;, say you are looking for signals that someone is &quot;passionate about web development&quot;, then think about evidence that supports the characteristic: eagerly learning, involvement with development-community, excited about new technology, willing to experiment, etc. You can also provide evidence that shows a candidate isn&#x27;t &quot;passionate&quot;. Just a matter of semantics.