TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Meteor Raises $20M to Build the One JavaScript Stack to Rule Them All

39 点作者 milkers将近 10 年前

9 条评论

highCs将近 10 年前
Previously discussed here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9569799" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9569799</a>
applecore将近 10 年前
It seems like a lot of these real-time capabilties should be part of the database layer, <i>à la</i> RethinkDB and its model of continuously pushing query results as they&#x27;re updated.<p>This way, you&#x27;re not locked into one JavaScript-based application development framework.
评论 #9706118 未加载
评论 #9706010 未加载
murbard2将近 10 年前
This is a bit tangential, but I really don&#x27;t get the value of using the same language on the client and the server. The advantages I see would be:<p>1) You need to know &#x2F; be comfortable with one language less<p>2) During development, you can easily move functions back and forth between the client code and the server code, progressively deciding what will be computed on the server and what will be computed on the client<p>3) You can generate, exchange, and execute code in real time between the client and the server<p><i>but</i><p>1) I don&#x27;t know any programmer who&#x27;s both competent and monolinguistic.<p>3) is of course insane for security reasons<p>2) I used to think this would be a thing, but once you take the approach of making the client a GUI to an API, this doesn&#x27;t tend to happen. It&#x27;s generally very clear what&#x27;s going to be server side and what&#x27;s going to be client side.
评论 #9706239 未加载
评论 #9706235 未加载
评论 #9706207 未加载
评论 #9706110 未加载
评论 #9706211 未加载
评论 #9706185 未加载
CydeWeys将近 10 年前
If it&#x27;s not going to be Free Software, who cares? I&#x27;ve seen so many people, projects, and companies burned by choosing a proprietary framework.
评论 #9705989 未加载
nickstinemates将近 10 年前
I have been hearing about Galaxy for around 2 years, looking forward to seeing it shipped and in users&#x27; hands.
bigtunacan将近 10 年前
Why has this been re-posted?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9569799" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9569799</a>
评论 #9706164 未加载
owenwil将近 10 年前
Why is this back on here today?
评论 #9706123 未加载
escusado将近 10 年前
if(Meteor.isServer)... uhm, no thanks.
评论 #9706173 未加载
评论 #9706049 未加载
anon3_将近 10 年前
The reality of javascript is different in browser and server (node&#x2F;io).<p>While I find that meteor was fun to work with, we ultimately opted for plain-old express + backbone. I think it&#x27;s abstraction is more of a disservice. It adds a lot of magic and unknowns to the picture.<p>After a few months, the initial value of having the unified codebase is exhausted, and you&#x27;re left with the technical debt of having already adopted their libraries and conventions.<p>It&#x27;s not really accurate to say that meteor allows you to use any library, you are adopting their conventions. In the end - using a single unified codebase in JS involves going against the grain in many aspects (I can elaborate if you like)
评论 #9705851 未加载
评论 #9705836 未加载