TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US and UK agents moved after China and Russia decrypt Snowden files

12 点作者 madradavid将近 10 年前

5 条评论

dang将近 10 年前
Please don't editorialize titles when submitting to HN.
beltsonata将近 10 年前
&gt;&quot;Well, we are told authoritatively by people in Downing Street, in the Home Office, in the intelligence services that the Russians and the Chinese have all this information and as a result of that our spies are having to pull people out of the field because their lives are in danger.&quot;<p>&quot;Authoritatively&quot;.<p>How can we tell if this is true or just a PR stunt? I&#x27;m naturally suspicious of anything the security services say, but can see that this could have a germ of truth.<p>I have no idea how Snowden encrypted the files, nor do I know if any people are singled out in them. Does anyone know any better?
评论 #9713891 未加载
veqz将近 10 年前
On the chance that this is true (I have no reason to trust the British government on any surveillance topic), that would mean one of three things: 1. Snowden messed up and chose a bad encryption scheme&#x2F;key. 2. Russia and China have the ability to break secure encryption schemes. 3. One of the journalists entrusted with the documents messed up with the handling of the keys.<p>Only number 3 seems a little bit possible, and even then I&#x27;m skeptical...
评论 #9714117 未加载
评论 #9714678 未加载
doctorshady将近 10 年前
After the recent OPM compromise, I&#x27;d find it hard to believe the US wouldn&#x27;t pull out their agents anyway.
评论 #9714282 未加载
beltsonata将近 10 年前
Greenwald has a good critique of the claims here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;firstlook.org&#x2F;theintercept&#x2F;2015&#x2F;06&#x2F;14&#x2F;sunday-times-report-snowden-files-journalism-worst-also-filled-falsehoods&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;firstlook.org&#x2F;theintercept&#x2F;2015&#x2F;06&#x2F;14&#x2F;sunday-times-r...</a>