TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Brands That Will Disappear In 2010

14 点作者 vas_popovski超过 15 年前

10 条评论

michael_dorfman超过 15 年前
I don't disagree with the general argument here, but the headline may be overstating things a bit-- I tend to think that some of these brands may be able to limp forward for a few more years before ultimately collapsing. There's an art to circling the drain...
forensic超过 15 年前
Why do they bother saying "Brands" when everyone knows that never happens?<p>Motorola, Kodak, Newsweek... whether they get bought out entirely or sold piece by piece, those brandnames are not going anywhere. They may get new management or aggressively downsize but there will always be Kodak products to buy, Newsweek will always be on the stands, and same for Motorola.<p>So why say the "Brands won't exist"? I don't get it.
评论 #976731 未加载
bep超过 15 年前
The source article, in one page: <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/12/02/the-ten-brands-that-will-disappear-in-2010/" rel="nofollow">http://247wallst.com/2009/12/02/the-ten-brands-that-will-dis...</a>
icey超过 15 年前
It's so frustrating to have to click 10 times to see the list. I thought "Hey, there's a printer-friendly version - I'll click that button!". Of course, it only prints the page you're currently on.<p>Thanks for the amazing user experience, Business Insider.
评论 #976831 未加载
stilist超过 15 年前
Must have been more than one writer involved—items 7–10 are in serious need of punctuation and general editing. (‘Kodak won’t cease to exit.’; ‘Its fate as a standalone company is however looking more and more like an inevitable fate.’)
评论 #976811 未加载
评论 #976868 未加载
KWD超过 15 年前
I hate when articles like this are split across multiple pages. Sure they want to increase the number of their page views for ad revenue, but I'd love to know the bounce rate on these multi-page lists. I did not bother to go further.
wkdown超过 15 年前
In an odd twist of irony, all ten companies post gains in 2010 while the domain businessinsider.com is sold for $200 to a porn company looking to bank on office affairs.
bitwize超过 15 年前
Can we just say that advanced smartphone manufacturers who attempt to compete with the iPhone will suffer massively for it?
评论 #976836 未加载
gcheong超过 15 年前
Is there some point to that photo of Buffet eating a popcicle?
bioweek超过 15 年前
I have a brokerage account at etrade. Is my money in danger?