TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

CloudFlare Forced to Censor Anti-Censorship Site

50 点作者 paralelogram将近 10 年前

2 条评论

themeekforgotpw将近 10 年前
The United States has a threat intelligence system with patterns of malicious activity including malware and cyber attacks.<p>This threat intelligence system is also used to specify patterns of foreign propaganda. However, similar to the story above, patterns that are too broad can silence legitimate speech by citizens.<p>An example of this is stopfasttrack.com. Their domain name was similar to Russian propaganda, so then the switch was flipped to censor the Russian domain from Facebook, Twitter and popular email providers, their site was caught in the net as well.<p>They posted to Reddit about it.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;technology&#x2F;duplicates&#x2F;38pmg8&#x2F;hey_reddit_someone_is_trying_really_hard_to_erase&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;technology&#x2F;duplicates&#x2F;38pmg8&#x2F;hey_re...</a><p>(The US government and NATO use the terms &#x27;troll&#x27; and &#x27;spam&#x27; as synonyms for foreign online propaganda)
评论 #9871694 未加载
geobmx540将近 10 年前
Any lawyers help me out here - if there is a legitimate concern of censorship of parties that clearly shouldn&#x27;t be affected - and CloudFlare refused to comply - wouldn&#x27;t someone have to take them to court where they could argue their case?
评论 #9871633 未加载