TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Think women in tech is just a pipeline problem?

67 点作者 mystique将近 10 年前

20 条评论

shoo将近 10 年前
More generally, not specific to the dear tech industry, there&#x27;s been a fantastic discussion on metafilter titled &quot;“Where’s My Cut?”: On Unpaid Emotional Labor&quot; [1]. If you are a person who has personal&#x2F;professional relationships with other people, it&#x27;s probably worth a read [2].<p>Anyhow, I&#x27;ll quote an excerpt from one of the comments:<p>&gt; A married man is considered (in the sociology findings) to bring &quot;more than&quot; one person to work with him, because it is assumed he has someoone feeding&#x2F;dressing&#x2F;cruise directing him. This frees up his brain space for ... work. On the other hand, a married woman is considered to bring less than a whole person to work. Because she is assumed to be feeding&#x2F;dressing&#x2F;cruise directing at least one other human. And possibly incubating another. This is taking up valuable brain space that could be devoted to work.<p>So, there&#x27;s a conscious or unconscious bias against women in working life, due to the assumption that they&#x27;ll be doing more than their fair share of unpaid, generally undervalued labor outside of the workplace. Oh so plausible. This would be a <i>rational</i> reason for a workplace to discriminate against women, given the existing context of structural unfairness and bias in the rest of society. &quot;Hurray!&quot;<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metafilter.com&#x2F;151267&#x2F;Wheres-My-Cut-On-Unpaid-Emotional-Labor" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metafilter.com&#x2F;151267&#x2F;Wheres-My-Cut-On-Unpaid-Emo...</a><p>[2] ...unless you are very uncomfortable with reading criticism of men, and you cannot stomach discomfort. in that case, it&#x27;s probably best for everyone involved if you don&#x27;t follow the link.
评论 #9959930 未加载
评论 #9960437 未加载
tzs将近 10 年前
&gt; A culture that rewards facetime and encourages people to regularly stay late or eat dinner at the office puts employees with families at a disadvantage (particularly mothers), and research shows that working excess hours does not actually improve productivity in the long-term since workers begin to experience burn out after just a few weeks<p>I suspect excessive hours also contributes to unintentional harassment [1], mostly against single women.<p>Most people are heterosexual. Most of them want to find partners to have relationships with ranging from casual flings to long term romantic relationships.<p>If people are expected to work long and hard hours they will be left without the time and&#x2F;or energy for activities outside of work where they can seek out sexual and romantic partners. Since people are <i>not</i> going to give up on seeking out sexual and romantic partners inevitably some of that activity will shift to the office. If that office has significantly more single men than single women it is going to get particularly annoying for the women.<p>[1] By &quot;unintentional harassment&quot; I mean actions that are takes as harassment by the person they are directed to, but are not intended as harassment by the person taking the action.
T2_t2将近 10 年前
Serious question: why are women so harsh to EACH OTHER? From the article:<p>&gt; both men and women were significantly more likely to hire a male applicant than a female applicant with an identical record.<p>And from the linked studies: &quot;Men only penalized female candidates for attempting to negotiate whereas women penalized both male and female candidates.&quot;<p>And the pay rates, and drops, from here <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pnas.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;109&#x2F;41&#x2F;16474.full.pdf+html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pnas.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;109&#x2F;41&#x2F;16474.full.pdf+html</a> are both worse from female faculty - with sale offered from men 30K -&gt; 29K vs 27K -&gt; 25K for female faculty, and male faculty scored women higher in all categories than the female faculty.
评论 #9960066 未加载
评论 #9960001 未加载
评论 #9960059 未加载
评论 #9959978 未加载
malandrew将近 10 年前
A few questions:<p>What does it mean to &quot;leave the field&quot;? Does that mean to no longer practice low-level work or to leave the industry entirely for another industry? If it is the former, does moving into management or another complementary area (like moving from engineering to product management) qualify as leaving the field?<p>So what I&#x27;ve always been curious about is what percentage of women leave other fields? It would be nice to have numbers to compare it to there.<p>Also, what percentage of men leave the field? If &quot;leaving the field&quot; is defined as no longer actively practicing software engineering and instead doing more human contact work (like managing), then I would expect a significant number of men to leave the field at all.<p>I&#x27;m not trying to dismiss the number out of hand, but merely demonstrate that it&#x27;s a useless figure to bandy about with context or comparison.
评论 #9960171 未加载
评论 #9959967 未加载
owen_griffiths将近 10 年前
&quot;almost all of them said they liked the work itself, but cited discriminatory environments as their main reason for leaving&quot;<p>If the work environment is not to women&#x27; liking and has no bearing on outcome, where are all the successful companies formed by women who want a more friendly environment?<p>&quot;This is a huge, unnecessary, and expensive loss of talent in a field facing a supposed talent shortage.&quot;<p>Again, if true, some enterprising person should have found a way to tap all the amazing talent.
评论 #9959825 未加载
评论 #9959836 未加载
评论 #9959851 未加载
评论 #9959957 未加载
评论 #9960146 未加载
评论 #9959861 未加载
sanxiyn将近 10 年前
&quot;When Google increased paid maternity leave from 12 weeks to 18 weeks, the number of new moms who quit Google dropped by 50%.&quot;<p>This seems to be such a spectacularly good result that I wonder why they haven&#x27;t tried it sooner.
评论 #9960071 未加载
评论 #9959959 未加载
评论 #9960062 未加载
评论 #9960040 未加载
Banzaaaai将近 10 年前
From my experience:<p>1. It is a pipeline problem (I never got as much women applications as I wanted, even with targeting a women audience)<p>2. It is a problem of not enough role models for women (so women do not see themselves in tech and do not aspire for tech careers or for becoming CTOs - women CTOs go a long way here).<p>3. It is a problem of the vile and toxicity of the tech community in general (just see all the fights over programming languages, about being right vs. understanding each other). And the bro culture in some places.<p>4. It is a problem of women in general being more risk averse (so they gamble less with salaries or risk to push for promotion)<p>5. It is a problem of job ads (male focused, where males might say &#x27;Ah I can do all those things&#x27; and women might say &#x27;I don&#x27;t know all the things they want&#x27;) and the recruiting process in general.
评论 #9960061 未加载
评论 #9964055 未加载
lawnchair_larry将近 10 年前
I agree there is a problem, but is it ever frustrating having to tolerate completely fallacious statistics and bogus metrics every time someone talks about this. That sets the conversation back.<p>There is no such thing as equally qualified for a promotion. To pretend that performance is a simple formula with two inputs is being disingenuous.<p>It is a pipeline problem, because I have interviewed zero females and 100 males. I&#x27;ve never even received a woman&#x27;s resume.<p>Any study related to people being more likely to hire, or pay more, involving names being switched on a resume, doesn&#x27;t make sense. Nobody hires a resume, they call you in for an interview.<p>VCs investing disproportionately in male CEOs is hardly surprising because even if they have no bias, they know their money is on the line for someone who will be up against the rest of the tech and business world, with all of its bias.<p>Diversity quotas are harmful. Great, now nobody takes you seriously not just because they&#x27;re biased to begin with but also because you only got the job over more qualified applicants to fill a quota. That isn&#x27;t helping anybody. A much better option is to get more women to apply.<p>I have actually taken bias training and yes, I&#x27;m biased as hell. I don&#x27;t like this fact and try to correct it. I also point it out to my male peers. But it&#x27;s really hard to overcome when nobody has non-junk data and nobody is showing up to interview.<p>And are we allowed to be open to the fact that maybe, on average, women are weaker performers in tech? It seems like that is not allowed to be an option. It should also be a possibility that they&#x27;re actually stronger performers in tech (I bet you reached for the down arrow before getting to that sentence). Pretending everyone must have equal ability and 50% of executives and 50% of programmers should be women doesn&#x27;t get us anywhere.
评论 #9960485 未加载
评论 #9965186 未加载
rchiba将近 10 年前
&gt; These biases occur unconsciously and without intention or malice.<p>As someone who has faced situations where a gender microagression has caused workplace conflict, the above quote cannot be stressed enough. Just because you didn&#x27;t have the intention to be biased or discriminate does not mean it did not happen. For some reason this concept eludes even the sharpest people.<p>We all have our biases. It&#x27;s about time we owned up to them and put effort into mitigating them.
评论 #9960055 未加载
ExpiredLink将近 10 年前
Where does the 50% obsession stem from? Serious question. Why <i>must</i> all fields be equally staffed by men and women?
评论 #9960110 未加载
natmaster将近 10 年前
&quot;Don’t rely on self-nominations or self-evaluations&quot;<p>I think this is the big thing that should be rallied around. This is prevalent, obvious, and hurts companies in more ways than just discrimination (not to marginalize that aspect).<p>Focusing on self-nominations means the most successful people aren&#x27;t going to be your people best able to do the job, but people best able to &#x27;play the game&#x27;. This is in fact not independent, but negatively correlated with skill. (Citation needed)
malandrew将近 10 年前
So I noticed that maternity leave is cited often, but that strikes me as a lesser problem in tech relative to the cost of housing. Raising a family in San Francisco is not a cheap proposition. Rent keeps rising in the Bay Area.<p>Let&#x27;s do a thought experiment.<p>Lets say a man and a women in tech both moved here 5 years ago and each got small rent-controlled studio apartments for about $1000&#x2F;month. Let&#x27;s say they met and started dating two years ago. They decide they want to move in together. They can forego one dwelling and share a studio apartment, or they can look on the market. They look around for a one-bedroom. Two years ago, a one bedroom is probably going for $2500 a month. Fast forward to today and they decide to have a kid. Everything is great for the first 1-2 years, but by 2017, they feel like they need a 2-bedroom. They start looking around and see that the only options cost about $5000 to $6000 month. That&#x27;s a huge cost of living increase before the cost of child-rearing and is far more likely to drive people (men and women) out of the industry than unfavorable maternity leave policies.<p>In the thought experiment above, both a man and a woman both leave tech in SF together once they are forced out of the area by the conflict between housing prices and raising a family. The different is that the age distribution for men is likely to much broader than for women because of the biological clock. A man marrying and having a kid could likely be anywhere from 27 or so to past 40, where the range for women is likely to have approximately the same lower bound, but a much lower higher bound. I suspect 33 or so. This would suggest that housing prices are more likely to prematurely end the careers of women in tech in San Francisco.
natmaster将近 10 年前
Earlier in the article the author states that both men and women have bias. Then we get this quote, &quot;If tech culture is going to change, everyone needs to change, especially men and most especially leaders.&quot;<p>It would be nice to know why &quot;especially men,&quot; with no foundation for this statement it makes it hard to believe as a scientist, and even harder to act upon.<p>Any revisions with this included would be greatly appreciated. :)
评论 #9963261 未加载
ousta将近 10 年前
frankly, the IT industry has to be the fairest industry in the world. the problem with statistics when one side has few data and the other side a lot (women in IT vs men in IT) is that you can &quot;choose&quot; datasets that speak for what we look for. it is easy to pick the bottom male engineers and compare them to women and im pretty sure women will be better paid at &quot;similar&quot; jobs (haven&#x27;t seen one similar job in 10 years in the it industry but ok).<p>I am myself married to a woman who codes and as long as she has shown to her managers that her productivity and quality of work was excellent she never got discriminated. people assume everything should come to them because it came to others. a company is not some socialist everland where everyone gets paid same. people get paid what their are worth (minus&#x2F;plus negotiation skills)<p>as for women leaving the field. knowing that most engineers in big companies or services companies are leaving the field to become PM or manager of something I see this as a sign that women are more passionate about their carreer than about IT.
flipp3r将近 10 年前
Didn&#x27;t read the whole article but this stood out to me;<p>&quot;Confirm that men and women with the same qualifications are earning the same amount and that they are receiving promotions and raises at similar rates (and if not, explore why).&quot;<p>Yeah, no. I have never worked for a company which pays employees based on skill, it&#x27;s all in salary negotiations. If you work for a company where salaries aren&#x27;t public, then this is the case for you. Also, although anecdotal, in my experience men are willing to risk more when they know they&#x27;re worth more than what they&#x27;re being paid.
评论 #9960167 未加载
评论 #9960090 未加载
natmaster将近 10 年前
I&#x27;m curious about this quote, &quot;Investors preferred entrepreneurial ventures pitched by a man than an identical pitch from a woman by a rate of 68% to 32% in a study conducted jointly by HBS, Wharton, and MIT Sloan. “Male-narrated pitches were rated as more persuasive, logical and fact-based than were the same pitches narrated by a female voice.”&quot;<p>They leave out all details on how the study was conducted. Does anyone know whether it was the same words, and they just changed the name, or if they actually composed different pitches?
评论 #9960120 未加载
评论 #9960128 未加载
venomsnake将近 10 年前
&gt; Create a collaborative environment Stanford research studies document that women are more likely to dislike competitive environments compared to men and are more likely to select out of them<p>That is not how it works. Tech is as pure marketplace of ideas as possible. So while we should all collaborate after the decisions are made, the process before them is by definition adversarial. We must nitpick and deconstruct each other&#x27;s solutions. Because we programmers cannot work if we don&#x27;t understand anything in full. To grok it.
评论 #9960131 未加载
natmaster将近 10 年前
I&#x27;m curious why only one of the studies about gender-bias has anything to do with tech. Are there just not enough studies being done in that field? Are there conclusions we should be making about the world at large? Why has the author chosen to focus on tech in the title, and yet diverge once getting to evidence?
imh将近 10 年前
Surprised not to see this [1] cited next to the Yale study for the sake of completeness.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pnas.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;112&#x2F;17&#x2F;5360.abstract" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pnas.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;112&#x2F;17&#x2F;5360.abstract</a>
orionblastar将近 10 年前
Most likely this submission will be flagged as most sexism or racism articles get flagged.<p>Corporate American needs a major reform. US society need a major reform. Our culture and community need major reforms. The way boys and girls are raised need to be changed, the way they are educated and develop social skills and people skills need to change as well.<p>As it is Corporate America and the Tech industry has developed a certain mindset based on the power elite of Silicon Valley that controls VC and who gets on the board of directors via shareholders. Everyone has to work 80+ hours a week, and it is hostile to trying to raise a family. Corporations favor the worker who is single over one that is married and has children. They don&#x27;t like it when there is responsibilities other than work that an employees has. Which is why there is no good maternity leave, or even child care services. Heck in most cases you have to drop your religion and become non-practicing so you don&#x27;t attend services so you can work more hours.<p>When I was a young boy in the 1970s it was different, people got the weekends off and spent it with the family with family picnics and they only worked 40+ hours a week, and took off for family matters. The 1980s and 1990s changed that and the Dotcom Boom made the Startups and marathon coding that required more time per week to work. People got less sleep, worked more hours, gave up relationships and family, and put everything into working a job.<p>For me it got so stressful that in June 2001 I developed a mental illness from all of the stress I was under and all of the extra hours I worked. I took time off to pick up my son from a babysitter because child care was not offered and my wife worked a different shift, and I got made fun of because I was taking care of my son instead of my wife. I ended up on short term disability and when I returned I was fired for being sick. You see once you become mentally ill they don&#x27;t want you, even if you were hurt in the line of duty. Which is why so many mentally ill people hide their illnesses and go untreated and then do a suicide later on. I ended up on disability in 2003.<p>I never made it back to work. But I know of all of the problems in the industry and can talk about them freely without worrying that I&#x27;ll be fired for talking about them.<p>In order to make up diversity, many tech companies use the H1B Visa program to hire people from India because they are not white males and because they will work for less money. Being from India gives them a more diverse work force, and they are disposable employees. If they don&#x27;t do what they are told, the Visa is canceled and they go back to their native country. Then the company hires someone else. It is a big racket.
评论 #9960028 未加载
评论 #9960027 未加载
评论 #9959934 未加载