TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Celsius may be better for chemistry. Fahrenheit is better for real life

4 点作者 bbali将近 10 年前

1 comment

stephengillie将近 10 年前
Basically, the argument boils down to 2 points:<p>1. Fahrenheit is more granular, by design<p>2. Americans are used to Fahrenheit and learning new things is not cognitively free.<p>Fahrenheit, as a scale, was created in a similar fashion to Celsius. But then the Fahrenheit scale was multiplied by 4. Like Celsius, Fahrenheit starts at freezing and boiling points - of brine (salt water), not pure water. This gives a lower freezing point (and boiling point?). Then that output was multiplied by 4, giving us the scale we have today.<p>My preferred solution is a compromise -- create a new temperature scale that is just Celsius multiplied by 4. On this scale:<p><pre><code> * Water freezes at 0 degrees * A nice room temperature is 80 degrees * Water boils at 400 degrees * Your oven dial would run from 260 degrees to 1040 degrees.</code></pre>
评论 #9984790 未加载